SPAIN: Prolific Serial Killer Transitions While Serving 127-Year Sentence, Is Now Being Held In A Women’s Unit – Reduxx

One of Spain’s most prolific serial killers is now being held in a women’s correctional unit after beginning to identify as transgender while behind bars. Joan Vila Dilmé, also known as the Olot nursing home killer, is reportedly now going by the name “Aida.”

Vila, 60, was sentenced to 127 years in prison in 2013 for the murders of 11 elderly residents at the care home he worked at.

During their report, the mainstream Spanish paper referred to Vila in the feminine, and attempted to minimize any allegations that this was done in order to gain any special treatment, arguing “her transition does not entail any benefits related to her sentence.”

As of now, he has yet to undergo any surgical alterations, but reportedly has plans to do so. His “gender-affirming” cosmetic surgeries will be paid for by Spain’s public healthcare system.

Source: SPAIN: Prolific Serial Killer Transitions While Serving 127-Year Sentence, Is Now Being Held In A Women’s Unit – Reduxx

Lesbian Action Group Inc v Australian Human Rights Commission [2026] FCA 432

DISCRIMINATION LAW – sex discrimination – exemption power – where the applicant applied to the Australian Human Rights Commission for an exemption from the prohibitions on discrimination on the grounds of sex, sexual orientation and gender identity in the Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) so that it could hold public events for “lesbians born female” only – where the Commission refused the application for the exemption – where the Tribunal affirmed the decision to refuse to grant the exemption – whether the Tribunal erred in its construction of the exemption power – whether the Tribunal erred by failing to comply with the duty in s 10A of the Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth) – appeal allowed

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.    The appeal be allowed.

2.    The decision of the Administrative Review Tribunal dated 20 January 2025 be set aside.

3.    The matter be remitted to the Administrative Review Tribunal (differently constituted) for determination according to law.

4.    Within seven days, the parties provide any agreed minute of order as to costs.

5.    If the parties cannot agree, then within 14 days each party file and serve a short submission on costs, and within a further 7 days each party file any short responding submission on costs, and the issue of costs then be determined on the papers.

Source: Lesbian Action Group Inc v Australian Human Rights Commission [2026] FCA 432

New laws close the door on domestic violence loophole – Yahoo News Australia

Violent offenders showing up to their former residence and terrorising their ex-partner will no longer get off on a technicality.

NSW is introducing laws that penalise perpetrators for breaking and entering into a home where domestic violence victim survivors live, regardless of whether the abuser has their name on a lease or is a joint owner.

It comes after a controversial High Court decision in 2023 ruled in favour of a defendant who kicked in the triple-locked door of his former partner’s home and assaulted her.

In a 4-3 decision, the court found the offender had a lawful authority to enter the apartment he was jointly leasing, regardless of whether the woman wanted him to and despite him having moved out months earlier.

Changes will also ensure an accused person will no longer be considered an occupant of a residence if a restraining order, a court order, a bail condition or parole stops them from living at the home.

The High Court judgment known as BA v The King related to a man who stormed his former partner’s home near Canberra in July 2019.

He grabbed the woman inside by the shoulders, shouted at her and threw her phone on the floor as she tried to call for help.

He pleaded guilty to common assault, intimidation and destruction of property in the NSW District Court, but contested the aggravated break and enter charge.

His acquittal on that charge by the District Court sparked a successful Crown appeal and orders for a retrial, only for the man to win his appeal in the highest court in Australia.

Source: New laws close the door on domestic violence loophole – Yahoo News Australia

Federal Court upholds appeal by lesbian group seeking single-sex event exemption | The Australian

A lesbian advocacy group has had a victory in its legal battle to exclude transwomen from its single sex public events, after the Federal Court upheld its appeal against a ruling by the Australian Human Rights Commission.

In a decision which may have significant implications for the interpretation of Australia’s Sex Discrimination Act, Federal Court Judge Mark Moshinsky found the first two grounds of the Lesbian Action Group’s appeal had been made out, and that it was therefore not necessary to make a judgment on the third and fourth grounds.

Justice Moshinsky ordered that the Administrative Review Tribunal set aside its previous dismissal of the group’s appeal, and that a differently constituted tribunal reconsider the matter.

LAG had sought a five-year exemption under the Sex Discrimination Act to hold “lesbians born female only” public events, and appealed to the ART, and subsequently the Federal Court when it was refused by the AHRC.

Wednesday’s verdict is likely to have implications for the Tickle vs. Giggle case, which is also currently before the Federal Court and involves transgender woman Roxanne Tickle, who successfully sued start-up founder Sall Grover over her women-only social media app, Giggle for Girls.

Shaken by their pasts, inter-country adoptees demand federal government broaden inquiry scope – ABC News

In short:

The federal government is being urged to broaden a new inquiry into a South Korean adoption program found to have a history of corruption and fraud.

Behind the push are numerous inter-country adoptees who arrived in Australia from the 1970s onwards as international adoption grew in popularity.

But many later learned stories about their biological parents were false or parts of their adoption paperwork had been fabricated.

Source: Shaken by their pasts, inter-country adoptees demand federal government broaden inquiry scope – ABC News

Parents claim they destroyed healthy IVF embryos after being misled by N.J. genetic testing companies – nj.com

Hackettstown-based Genomic Prediction and Livingston-based Cooper Genomics face federal class action lawsuits alleging false advertising of PGT-A embryo testing.

Allison Freeman, an attorney representing the plaintiffs, said patients purchase the testing because it’s sold as having “high percentages of accuracy.”

The testing, which is rarely covered by insurance, is offered as an optional add-on during the IVF process. Although it’s marketed as increasing pregnancy and live birth rates, major medical organizations have stated that further research is necessary to establish its value.

The American Society for Reproductive Medicine published a practice guideline in 2018 concluding “there is insufficient evidence to recommend the routine use of preimplantation genetic testing-aneuploidy in all infertile women.”

Despite this, the proportion of IVF cycles using PGT-A increased from 14% in 2014 to 44% in 2019, according to national data from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Source: Parents claim they destroyed healthy IVF embryos after being misled by N.J. genetic testing companies – nj.com

UK man who sexually abused girl has visa reinstated over ‘strong ties’ to Australia – ABC News

A British man who sexually abused a nine-year-old girl has had his Australian permanent visa reinstated by a tribunal, after it was automatically cancelled following his conviction.

The Administrative Review Tribunal reversed the cancellation due to his “ill health” and “strong ties” to Australia.

Contacted by the ABC, the man said: “Well, I’ve got my visa back, so it’s all good”, as the victim’s family calls for the decision to be overturned.

The man, who has lived in Australia for several decades, had also been charged in relation to the sexual abuse of a young boy, but was acquitted by a jury.

The mother of that boy, Linda*, said she and the young girl’s families were both “horrified” to learn he had avoided deportation.

“[We were] completely let down, completely betrayed,” she told the ABC.

“His needs were put before the victim’s, before the community … why are we giving priority to an abuser over Australian child victims of sexual abuse?”

Linda wrote to Mr Burke on three occasions, pleading he deport the man “in the public interest”.The Department of Home Affairs responded to Linda earlier this year on behalf of the immigration minister, advising that his personal powers were “non-compellable”.”That is, the ministers are not required to exercise their power,” the letter said.

“Further, what is in the public interest is a matter for the ministers to determine.

“I appreciate this is not the response you were hoping for … I can assure you that your correspondence has been noted.”

Source: UK man who sexually abused girl has visa reinstated over ‘strong ties’ to Australia – ABC News

The real reasons birth rates are declining worldwide | New Scientist

All entries on Feminist Legal Clinic’s News Digest Blog are extracts from news articles and other publications, with the source available at the link at the bottom. The content is not originally generated by Feminist Legal Clinic and does not necessarily reflect our views.

The fall is astonishing. At its height, the global fertility rate hit 5.3 births per woman in 1963, but it has been in near-constant decline ever since. Sixty years on, it is now only around 2.2. In many countries, it is far lower than the roughly 2.1 babies per woman that would sustain current population sizes, known as the replacement rate.

With the birth rate now sitting at about 1.4 to 1.6 in countries like the UK, Australia and the US – and as low as 1.2 in Japan and 0.75 in South Korea – our understanding of the global fertility decline has so far been driven by demographers, who take whole-population views and try to predict the future.

What this misses, argues Paula Sheppard, a cognitive and evolutionary anthropologist at the University of Oxford, are the nuances: which groups of society are having fewer children, and the different reasons why.

Penny Sarchet: There seems to be a lot of panic about birth rates at the moment.

Paula Sheppard: There’s a misconception: people think they’ve never been this low before, but they’re actually not [a record low]. After the second world war, rates were very low as well, and demographers, politicians and policy-makers were panicking. Demographers were trying to project what the population would look like – would birth rates recover? But the projections made in the late 1940s, when people weren’t having many babies after the war, were lower than what actually turned out to happen. Nobody got it right, because no one predicted the baby boom.

I’ve wondered if women simply don’t want to have the replacement level of children, and women with more education have more control over how many children they have. But your work has found that they are having fewer children than they would like?

People still want two or three kids. Not everyone does – there are always some people who don’t want kids at all. But in the UK, for every three babies that are wanted, only two are born.

However, higher-educated women are quite prepared not to have kids unless they’re sure that the father is going to invest as heavily as they are as a co-parent. I think it is because women take a higher career penalty.

It famously takes a village to raise a child and, due to urbanisation, more people than ever don’t have that village.

This is the crux of the matter. Social support was the most important thing in the study. A defining feature of our species is that female humans are able to have multiple dependent children at once. You don’t see this in chimpanzees, for example.

This cooperative breeding is literally what makes us human, and in every group I studied, they wanted support from their partner or their parents. The higher-educated women also wanted friends’ support – they wanted to know that there were mothers’ groups they could join and that their friends were also having kids.

You found that higher-educated women see it as unusual to have children before their 30s, which is quite old, anthropologically speaking. What’s driven this?

I think the reason people are waiting that long is because families are struggling to have all their proverbial ducks in a row before they’re ready to have a family – or have another child. If you made work and parenting more compatible, I think people would have kids younger.

Amid all the headlines and political commentary around birth rates, what’s the one thing you wish people could know about the issue?

It is about making parenting and working compatible, whatever that means for different people, and stopping pitting them against each other. They always used to be compatible. Women have always worked and they have always had kids. It’s just that now we live in this patriarchal setting: the office is the office, and children don’t go there. Instead, let’s change this whole culture.

Source: RemovePaywall | Free online paywall remover

Mom Threatens Melania She’ll Tell All if Custody of Son Not Returned | Women’s Coalition

All entries on Feminist Legal Clinic’s News Digest Blog are extracts from news articles and other publications, with the source available at the link at the bottom. The content is not originally generated by Feminist Legal Clinic and does not necessarily reflect our views.

Flanked by giant flags, with the Presidential seal looming above, Melania declared that she was never friends with, nor a victim of either Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell, the two most infamous child sex traffickers of our time. She insisted they were only acquaintances who had briefly crossed paths at parties.

Apparently, Melania has never heard of the Streisand Effect.

Her valiant effort to put a lid on any notion she may have been associated with the evil duo had the opposite effect: it’s blown up speculation about whatever the reason could be that the extremely private First Lady, who’s assiduously avoided commenting on anything Epstein, would suddenly speak out about the #1 scandal of the century.

Why would she do this. And why now?

Turns out, you don’t have to look far. Amanda Ungaro, a long-time friend of Melania’s, has just publicly slung some nasty threats in her direction, implying that the President and she are guilty of being involved with child sex abuse and/or trafficking. And she is ready to tell all.

These threats are most certainly being made in an effort to get her 15 year-old son returned to her custody, after her ex implemented an elaborate scheme with which to take their son away from her. The fact that she says, “I have nothing left to lose” indicates it is because she has lost what is most precious to her: her child. And she will do whatever it takes to get him back, including incriminating the President and First Lady.

Ironically, this particular crime—child sex abuse—is the one thing that can take down even the most powerful people, and, hence, whoever has the evidence has the ability to control the perpetrator, which is exactly why Epstein gathered this kind of dirt on everyone.

Trump has been accused of sexually assaulting at least four children, so it is not out of the realm of possibility. Katie Johnson (pseudonym) filed a lawsuit in 2016 claiming she and a girl named Maria had been sexually assaulted by Trump and Epstein when they were 11 and 12 years-old at Epstein’s NY mansion. She withdrew the suit due to threats on her life, but it can still be found online.

Recent evidence in the Epstein files have evidence that Trump sexually assaulted a 13 year-old girl (name redacted), who retaliated by biting Trump’s penis. Sascha Riley Barros alleges Trump raped him when he was 12 years-old and Sascha retaliated by impaling him.

All of these disclosures appear to have corroboration, but none have been investigated. Trump denies them all.

Source: Mom Threatens Melania She’ll Tell All if Custody of Son Not Returned

Had an honest conversation with Senator Weiner about women’s safety. – YouTube| Tish Hyman