Inside the Gay Tech Mafia | WIRED

All entries on Feminist Legal Clinic’s News Digest Blog are extracts from news articles and other publications, with the source available at the link at the bottom. The content is not originally generated by Feminist Legal Clinic and does not necessarily reflect our views.

No one can say exactly when, or if, gay men started running Silicon Valley.

[W]hen I call up a well-connected hedge fund manager to ask his thoughts about what is sometimes referred to in industry circles as the “gay tech mafia,” he audibly yawns. “Of course,” he says. “This has always been the case.”

And it is absolutely the case now, he adds, when gay men are running influential companies in Silicon Valley and maintain entire social calendars with scarcely a straight man, much less a woman, in sight. “Of course the gay tech mafia exists,” he continues. “This is not some Illuminati conspiracy theory. And you do not have to be gay to join. They like straight guys who sleep with them even more.”

Sure, there were gay men in high places: Peter Thiel, Tim Cook, Sam Altman, Keith Rabois, the list went on. But the idea that they were operating some kind of shadowy cabal seemed born entirely of homophobia.

At an AI conference in Los Angeles, an engineer casually referred to a top AI firm’s offices, more than once, as “twink town.”

One San Francisco investor tells me that he believes the Thiel Fellowship is a training ground for gay industry leaders.

[O]ne afternoon in late November, spend nearly an hour texting one . . . account owner over Signal who agrees to speak to me only if I keep his handle secret.

This person describes the Valley as a place known for “ecstasy, psychedelic fueled gay sex stuff.” Has he experienced any of it himself? No. But he knows people who have—people who are “pretty afraid” and “young af.” He won’t name names, won’t connect me to anyone, but he swears that any negative rumor I’ve heard about gay men in Silicon Valley is true. He suggests a conspiracy so sprawling it rivals QAnon and implicates the entire US government.

Finally, frustrated by his evasiveness, I ask what he thinks will happen if he tells me what he knows. “I truly believe,” he says, “killed.”

The problem with conspiracy theories, even offensive ones, is that they are rarely wholly invented.

Most of the people who speak to me for this story do so on the condition that their names be kept confidential.

In 2022, a popular anonymous tech insider X account, Roon, tweeted that it was “crazy how venture capitalists have reinvented the Roman system of pederasty.”

I’m told to connect with Joel, a gay man who works in tech and who spent a lot of time among the older in-group of powerful gay men in Silicon Valley, more than a decade ago.

When I ask Joel to explain how the gay tech mafia works, he tells me that it’s similar to people who “went to the same college or came from a similar background or a similar town.”

Joel tells me about the parties at the time—the exact specifics of which remain off the record. But they were, in summary, what you might expect.

I tell Joel that I’ve heard from some young men in the tech industry who feel pressured to sleep around to get ahead. Was that true in his experience? “Mmmmm,” he says, and pauses. Then he bursts out laughing. “I mean, in all of this, there are weird gray areas. It can be very sexual. It is not all professional. A lot of people have dated or slept with each other.” He had experienced a kind of coercion firsthand. “I definitely felt pressured to do—not overtly illegal things. But they walked the line.”

The exchange of sex and status may not be the reason these men rose so quickly, but it can be a factor—if only because sex, as he puts it, “makes people become closer rapidly.”

Source: Inside the Gay Tech Mafia | WIRED

EXCLUSIVE: Transgender Baby Killer Released Into Indiana Community 30 Years Before The End of His 55-Year Sentence | Genevieve Gluck

All entries on Feminist Legal Clinic’s News Digest Blog are extracts from news articles and other publications, with the source available at the link at the bottom. The content is not originally generated by Feminist Legal Clinic and does not necessarily reflect our views.

A trans-identified male convicted of the grisly murder of an infant has been released on parole a full 30 years early. Jonathan Richardson, who now uses the name Autumn Cordellioné, was convicted in 2002 after his 11-month-old stepdaughter died in his care while her mother was at work. Having served less than half of his 55-year sentence, Richardson was quietly released in late December of 2025.

Without an official statement from the DOC, it is unclear why Richardson was released early. However, the decision may have been linked to an injunction granted in state court that required the IDOC to provide Richardson with taxpayer-funded cosmetic surgeries. Releasing Richardson early may have been the IDOC’s strategy to avoid paying for the court-ordered cosmetic enhancements.

As previously reported by Reduxx, in 2023, the ACLU of Indiana filed a legal complaint on behalf of Richardson claiming that the IDOC was subjecting him to “cruel and unusual punishment” by denying him the various plastic surgeries he had demanded.

[D]uring court proceedings Richardson stated that he had amended his demands to two surgeries, an orchiectomy and a penile inversion.

In addition to identifying as transgender, Richardson identifies as “Muslim,” and had launched a separate lawsuit against his prison’s chaplain for being denied a hijab.

Richardson had been serving a 55-year sentence for the murder of his 11-month-old stepdaughter after he had been left to care for the child while her mother was at work.

Richardson went to a neighbor’s home and asked them to call 911, claiming the child was unresponsive. The baby would later die at the hospital, with the cause of death determined to be asphyxiation by manual strangulation.

Richardson was booked awaiting a court hearing, and would later tell a prison official “all I know is I killed the little fucking bitch.” The following year, he was found guilty and sentenced to 55 years in prison.

Since being released, Richardson has created several social media profiles and has launched an OnlyFans, where he says he has been selling pornography of himself.

In other social media posts, the transgender baby killer describes being in a relationship with another man who claims to identify as transgender and was also convicted of killing an infant. In 2015, Cory Wallace set his house on fire in an attempt to cover up the fact that he had battered his 4-month old son to death. The following year, Wallace was convicted of charges including neglect of a dependent resulting in death and arson and sentenced to 72 years in prison.

Wallace, who is to spend the rest of his life in prison, has persisted in filing lawsuits against the IDOC. In July 2023 Wallace demanded a hefty payout of $500,000 as compensation for not having been granted state-funded cosmetic surgeries.

The mother of the baby girl Richardson strangled to death opposed his legal bid to obtain surgery. Linda Thomas submitted a brief statement expressing her concern that his identity may be concealed from her when he is released from prison.

Source: EXCLUSIVE: Transgender Baby Killer Released Into Indiana Community 30 Years Before The End of His 55-Year Sentence

ABC cuts ties with trans lobby group ACON after bias exposed | The Australian

The ABC has abandoned its partnership with ACON following revelations by The Australian that the broadcaster’s news and programming had been heavily influenced by the radical agenda of the trans lobby group. 

The move comes four months after this masthead exposed a string of cases in which the broadcaster’s independence was compromised by its membership of ACON’s Pride in Diversity and workplace benchmarking schemes, with the ABC winning points and awards for “positive programming”. 

Further documents obtained under Freedom of Information laws last month showed how the ABC won platinum status with ACON after pledging to use its unique position to push the advocacy group’s agenda in its on-air journalism and programming.

Former ABC’s managing director David Anderson had already won Pride in Diversity’s “CEO of the Year” award.

In an internal newsletter circulated to some staff this week, the ABC said it had conducted an ­assessment of its external partnerships and concluded some were “no longer providing sufficient value” to the organisation.

ABC management was also ending relationships with the Australian Disability Network and the Diversity Council of Australia and reviewing other partnerships, the circular said, thereby “ensuring that our standards of independence are maintained”.

Asked whether the ABC now acknowledged that its relationship with ACON had damaged its editorial and programming integrity, the ABC told The Australian on Wednesday that the review of workplace partnerships had ­“affirmed we are meeting our obligations of editorial independence and impartiality”. 

The ABC “remains committed to diversity and inclusion and will redirect funding to internal initiatives”, the spokesperson said.

Particularly worrying for critics was a failure of ABC news and current affairs programs to report on the growing scientific and medical challenges to “gender-affirming” medical ­intervention for children and teens.

Several prominent ABC journalists, including those who have reported favourably on gender-affirming medical care, have hosted ACON’s Pride events.

In Britain, the BBC withdrew from a similar partnership with charity Stonewall in 2021 over concerns that the relationship had damaged its integrity.

Previously known as the AIDS Council of NSW, ACON changed direction under a plan by its then director of community health, Teddy Cook, switching its focus from gay health to trans rights.

As the nation’s self-appointed arbiter of “workplace inclusion” for trans employees, ACON boasts that more than 500 member employers –including Australia’s largest government agencies, public and private companies, universities and research organisations – had signed up to its trans rights agenda.

Like other Pride in Diversity members, the ABC has spent tens of thousands of dollars and hundreds of hours of staff time implementing ACON’s workplace demands, changing computer systems to allow non-binary titles like Mx, building all-gender bathrooms and offering “gender affirmation leave”.

The broadcaster inched closer to its ultimate goal of Platinum status every time it put trans-friendly content to air.

Baby Should Be Immediately Removed from Convicted Child Predator – Daily Citizen

Brandon Keith Mitchell is a Tier 1 registered sex offender, and yet he and his homosexual partner recently obtained custody of a newborn baby through surrogacy.

How is this even possible?

There’s a loophole in Pennsylvania law that doesn’t bar sex offenders from privately contracting with other parties in reproductive agreements.

Mitchell and his partner have been parading the baby on social media, and even solicited funds to pay for the surrogate. A journalist decided to dig into the background of the two men and discovered Mitchell had previously been arrested for soliciting a 16-year-old boy.

As a chemistry teacher at Downingtown West High School in Downingtown, Pennsylvania, the 30-year-old Mitchell pleaded guilty to felony child pornography charges and corruption of a minor. He sent over 12,000 text messages to the student. He was sentenced to two years in prison.

Those who support same-sex parenting often to point to studies indicating there’s no difference between a child being raised by two men or two women compared to being raised by a mother and a father. Yet, those studies have been shown to be fundamentally flawed. They’re often based on self-reporting, feature individuals recruited from same-sex advocacy groups – and are often only looking at small groups for a short period of time.

The Pennsylvania legislature needs to immediately close the loophole that allows convicted child sexual predators to contract to basically buy a child. That’s legislation every sane person should unequivocally support.

Source: Baby Should Be Immediately Removed from Convicted Child Predator – Daily Citizen

Moira Deeming survives Victorian Liberal preselection battle after rivals withdraw – ABC News

Victorian Liberal MP Moira Deeming has secured top spot on the party’s upper-house ticket for the Western Metropolitan Region after a chaotic preselection battle.

Mrs Deeming secured preselection after the other candidates withdrew from the running.

She previously dropped her candidacy after the party overlooked her for businessman and Indian community leader Dinesh Gourisetty, who garnered support from the party’s moderate wing.

But Mr Gourisetty was forced to step aside when it was revealed he had provided a character reference for a now-convicted child sex offender, triggering another preselection contest.

Mrs Deeming was the only eligible nominee for the position.

Source: Moira Deeming survives Victorian Liberal preselection battle after rivals withdraw – ABC News

$2.46 Billion ‘Momnibus’ Bill Targets Pregnant Women for Vaccination | John Fleetwood

All entries on Feminist Legal Clinic’s News Digest Blog are extracts from news articles and other publications, with the source available at the link at the bottom. The content is not originally generated by Feminist Legal Clinic and does not necessarily reflect our views.

A federal bill introduced in Congress would create a system where pregnant women are not only targeted for increased vaccination but also tracked through a federally coordinated surveillance network that activates during pandemics.

H.R. 7973—the “Momnibus Act”—authorizes a staggering $2.46 billion overall, with $715 million of that specifically allocated to build this structure: combining mass vaccination initiatives with a real-time data tracking system designed to monitor health status, outcomes, and demographic characteristics during declared public health emergencies.

The bill constructs a pipeline to identify the population, increase medical intervention, and track the results—continuously, at scale, and under federal coordination.

From a health freedom standpoint, this represents a shift away from individual consent-driven care and toward a system where specific populations are identified, targeted, and monitored during crises.

The legislation was introduced on March 18, 2026 by U.S. Representative Lauren Underwood (D-IL-14) and immediately routed to multiple House committees, including Energy and Commerce.

It remains at the earliest stage of the legislative process, with no hearings or votes.

Campaign finance data shows support from healthcare systems, insurance networks, and pharmaceutical-aligned interests—industries that would directly benefit from:

  • expanded vaccination programs
  • increased federal funding streams
  • long-term surveillance infrastructure

The same entities positioned to carry out the bill’s mandates are among those funding its sponsor.

Funding is explicitly tied to expanding these efforts, with hundreds of millions authorized specifically for awareness and equity campaigns that prioritize populations with “low rates of vaccination” and “racial and ethnic minority groups.”

The federal government is authorized to identify which groups are not complying with recommended vaccination schedules and focus massive resources on increasing uptake in those populations.

That is a shift from informed consent at the individual level to behavioral targeting at the population level.

All collected data must be categorized by “race, ethnicity, gender, primary language, geography, socioeconomic status.”

Rather than just tracking disease, the bill would allow tracking of mothers who have the disease, where they are, and what demographic group they belong to.

That enables targeted interventions and creates a framework for population-level categorization tied to medical status.

Source: $2.46 Billion ‘Momnibus’ Bill Targets Pregnant Women for Vaccination—Builds $715 Million Real-Time Surveillance System Activated During Pandemics

Equal Identities: A human rights review of the experiences of trans and gender diverse people in Australia | AHRC

All entries on Feminist Legal Clinic’s News Digest Blog are extracts from news articles and other publications, with the source available at the link at the bottom. The content is not originally generated by Feminist Legal Clinic and does not necessarily reflect our views.

Source: Equal Identities: A human rights review of the experiences of trans and gender diverse people in Australia – EQUAL_IDENTITIES_FINAL_DIGITAL.pdf

Psychiatric Morbidity Among Adolescents and Young Adults Who Contacted Specialised Gender Identity Services in Finland in 1996–2019: A Register Study – Ruuska – Acta Paediatrica – Wiley Online Library

Results

Gender-referred adolescents showed significantly higher psychiatric morbidity than controls both before (45.7% vs. 15.0%) and ≥ 2 years after referral (61.7% vs. 14.6%). Those referred after 2010 had greater psychiatric needs than earlier cohorts, both before (47.9% vs. 15.3%) and ≥ 2 years after (61.3% vs. 14.2%) referral. Among adolescents who underwent medical gender reassignment, psychiatric morbidity increased markedly during follow-up—rising from 9.8% to 60.7% in feminising gender reassignment and from 21.6% to 54.5% in masculinising gender reassignment. After adjusting for prior psychiatric treatment, all gender-referred adolescents had similarly elevated risks of psychiatric morbidity, with hazard ratios approximately three times higher than female controls and five times higher than male controls.

Conclusion

Severe psychiatric morbidity is common among gender-referred adolescents and appears to be more prevalent in those referred after the recent surge in referrals. Psychiatric needs do not subside after medical gender reassignment.

Summary

  • Gender-referred adolescents show high psychiatric morbidity, yet gender differences and mental health trajectories after medical gender reassignment remain poorly understood.
  • These adolescents had markedly higher psychiatric morbidity than controls before and after referral, with treatment needs often persisting and even intensifying after medical interventions—on some, they might even have a negative impact.
  • Findings emphasise the need for thorough psychiatric assessment and ongoing treatment throughout medical gender reassignment.

Source: Psychiatric Morbidity Among Adolescents and Young Adults Who Contacted Specialised Gender Identity Services in Finland in 1996–2019: A Register Study – Ruuska – Acta Paediatrica – Wiley Online Library

‘Some men might not like it’: Why women are choosing prenups | SMH

Jodylee Bartal, an accredited specialist in family law and a principal solicitor at Melbourne firm KHQ Lawyers, says BFAs are growing in popularity among women.

They set out how assets will be split in the event of a relationship breakdown, allowing couples to sidestep a costly and time-consuming court process.

The contracts may be struck at any time before or during a marriage or de facto relationship, or after it sours. Both parties must have independent legal advice before signing.

Wealthy older men seeking to protect their assets from younger new partners were among the first to embrace BFAs, triggering a flurry of litigation in Australia over the validity of agreements forged under pressure.

Financially secure younger women are also more likely to ask a partner to sign an agreement, reflecting “advancements we’ve made as a community in terms of gender equality”.

In 2017, the High Court struck down an agreement between a wealthy Australian property developer and his younger wife on the grounds of unconscionable conduct. The court said he met her on “a website for potential brides” when he was 67 and she was 36.

Sinclair says there has been less litigation involving BFAs in recent years because the courts have provided clear guidance.

His main concern with younger couples is that “you don’t have a crystal ball” and it might be unwise to reduce everything to a contract. Sinclair says it makes more sense to “quarantine” specific assets brought into the relationship rather than trying to cover every future eventuality.

Source: The rise of the prenup: Why more Australian women are protecting their assets from younger partners

Sociodemographic Drivers of Donor and Recipient Gender Disparities in Living Kidney Donation in Australia – PMC (from 2023)

Background

Females account for 60% of all living kidney donors worldwide. We defined the proportion of female to male donors for living donor kidney transplantation stratified by recipient gender, and explored the factors associated with female kidney donation.

Results

Of 3523 living donor pairs, 2203 (63%) recipients were male, and 2012 (57%) donors were female. Male recipients were more likely to receive kidneys from female donors than male donors. Donor and recipient sex association was modified by donor-recipient relationship (P < 0.01), with sensitivity analysis suggesting that spousal donor-recipient pairs drive this interaction. Older recipients residing in regional or remote areas were more likely to receive kidneys from female donors compared with those from major cities (aged ≥60 years: 0.67 [0.63–0.71] vs. aged <60 years: 0.57 [0.53–0.60]).

Conclusions

Factors associated with female donation include recipient sex, with spousal donors contributing to the interaction between recipient gender and donor-recipient relationship. Recipient age and location of residence have interactive effects on the likelihood of living donor transplantation from female donors.

Source: Sociodemographic Drivers of Donor and Recipient Gender Disparities in Living Kidney Donation in Australia – PMC