The Fate of Twenty-one Los Angeles Siblings | The New Yorker

One afternoon last May, four detectives knocked on the door of a $3.2-million mansion in Arcadia, a wealthy city in Los Angeles County. Earlier that day, they’d received a call about one of the mansion’s residents: a two-month-old baby named Walter. Walter had recently been admitted with severe head injuries to the intensive-care unit of a nearby hospital. His mother said he’d fallen off the bed, but his symptoms were consistent with the kind of trauma one might see from a car accident—or after a prolonged shaking.

When the police entered the mansion, they were surprised to find that it had an institutional feel. There were CCTV cameras everywhere, bedrooms filled with cribs, and, in classrooms downstairs, more than a dozen children seated at desks in front of whiteboards. It was impossible to tell the girls and boys apart, since all of them had shaved heads.

“This was definitely something I’d never seen before,” Sergeant Mario Castro, of the Arcadia Police Department, told me. He thought he’d walked into an unlicensed day care. But Walter’s parents, Silvia Zhang and Guojun Xuan, insisted that all the children belonged to them. After some counting—and the consulting of an Excel spreadsheet—the officers determined that Silvia and Guojun were the parents of twenty-one children in total, nearly all under the age of three. As the couple explained that evening, this feat had been accomplished by hiring dozens of women across the country as surrogates.

On May 9th, Silvia and Guojun were arrested on suspicion of child endangerment, and their children were taken into foster care. The couple was released three days later, but the children have remained in state custody ever since.

[I]n the short term, is that Silvia and Guojun’s twenty-plus kids will remain in foster care until they are placed into guardianships or adopted, probably by their foster families. Although the parents are challenging the rulings, it seems unlikely that Arcadia’s most infamous family will be brought back together.

Since Silvia and Guojun’s arrest, last May, they have had at least six more children, also through surrogates, bringing their tally to twenty-seven.

Despite the stakes of commercial surrogacy—and its incursion into the most delicate realm of private life—it remains largely unregulated in the U.S.

After news of Silvia and Guojun’s arrest broke last summer, many of their surrogates questioned how the couple’s family-making scheme had been allowed to unfold for years without anyone stopping it. The couple had opened their own agency, Mark Surrogacy, to recruit gestational carriers; dozens of women had been led to believe they were helping the couple have their second or third child.

And yet, besides the alleged child abuse, what the parents had done was perfectly legal. “Incredibly permissive laws make it easy to create children through surrogacy with no regard to their well-being,” Emma Waters, a senior policy analyst at the Heritage Foundation, told me. Most surrogates are extensively vetted by the agencies they sign up with, while most intended parents—that is, the customers paying for their services—are not.

Source: The Fate of Twenty-one Los Angeles Siblings | The New Yorker

Closing the Surrogacy Loopholes No One Should Have Left Open: Protecting Children in the Surrogacy Era – The Center for Bioethics & Culture Network

Rep. Scott Perry has introduced two bills aimed at addressing some of the most troubling shortcomings in the surrogacy industry.

The first bill, the “Protecting Kids from Creeps Act,” would prohibit registered sex offenders from entering surrogacy agreements or obtaining parental rights through assisted reproduction. It would also impose penalties on surrogacy agencies that facilitate such arrangements. The idea that the legal system must explicitly prohibit sex offenders from accessing children through surrogacy highlights a deeper structural failure: assumptions about safety and eligibility in assisted reproduction have not been adequately codified into law. The fact that Congress is now advancing legislation to explicitly bar sex offenders from accessing children through surrogacy underscores a fundamental truth: reproductive technology has advanced far faster than the legal frameworks meant to govern it.

The second bill, the “Preventing International Surrogacy Exploitation Act,” would prohibit foreign nationals from obtaining children through U.S.-based surrogacy arrangements. In practical terms, it would close the American surrogacy market to international intended parents and address a growing area of concern within the billion-dollar global fertility industry.

Supporters view these measures as overdue safeguards that should have been in place from the beginning.

Source: Closing the Surrogacy Loopholes No One Should Have Left Open: Protecting Children in the Surrogacy Era – The Center for Bioethics & Culture Network

Court transcription company VIQ Solutions to be shut down, mass redundancies expected – ABC News

There are fears mass redundancies at Australia’s main transcription service could leave court cases around the country in limbo after it was revealed VIQ Solutions would be wound down.

The ABC understands all VIQ Solutions court transcribers are expected to be made redundant and no further orders for transcripts will be accepted through its portal.

However, the Federal Court said contingency plans were being worked on.

VIQ Solutions was embroiled in controversy earlier this year after the ABC revealed sensitive court files were being transcribed in India in breach of the company’s multi-million-dollar government contract.Complaint lodged with Canada’s privacy commissioner over Australian court breach

Litigants in at least 146 court matters were potentially involved in a data breach that is now the subject of a formal complaint with the privacy commissioner in Canada, Senate estimates has been told.

Administrators McGrathNicol were called in on March 16 to urgently assess the company’s viability, four weeks after the breach was made public.

VIQ Solutions was responsible for transcription services for the family and federal courts, the South Australian Employment Tribunal, as well as the courts and tribunals in Queensland, New South Wales, Victoria and Western Australia.

A spokesperson for the Federal Court of Australia said it was taking “all necessary steps” to ensure control of court data and recordings.

“Longer-term arrangements will be focused on a low-cost model for transcript services for all litigants, including those most disadvantaged or at risk, at the core of its design.”

Greens Senator David Shoebridge, who sits on the legal and constitutional affairs committee, said the federal courts’ reputation had been damaged.

“This kind of essential public service should never have been privatised in the first place, and now that the monopoly corporate provider is exiting it leaves the court system in a shambles,” he said.

“Whoever signed and oversaw this contract needs to front Senate Estimates and explain what due diligence they did on a company that has offshored private information, now gone broke and seriously damaged the reputation of our Federal Courts.”

Source: Court transcription company VIQ Solutions to be shut down, mass redundancies expected – ABC News

Greens co-founder Drew Hutton declares war on the green-left | The Australian

At his time of life, you would think Drew Hutton had greener pastures to tend – specifically, on his retreat in the verdant Sunshine Coast hinterland. Or that he would be busy living up to the promise he made to his wife that he was through with the guff and grind of politics to finally put her first.

But here he is, aged 79 and with the fire burning afresh in his flat belly, walking away from the party he co-founded in 1992 with his old friend Bob Brown to strike out in a bold new venture.

There’s no doubt some in the Greens will say good riddance. Hutton’s falling out with the hierarchy in his home state of Queensland has been epic. What began as a dispute over the right to speak his mind – on transgender policy, of all things – metastasised into a tooth and nail struggle over the values and direction of the party, pitting the stalwart activist against both a vindictive state machine and Brisbane-based federal Greens leader Larissa Waters. 

Hutton’s last hurrah was to steer Larissa Waters through preselection to become the first Greens senator from Queensland in 2010. They no longer speak.

“I’ve never been one for putting hard work into a hopeless cause,” Hutton tells Inquirer.

“Given that fanatics are in ­control and the membership just simply is either too frightened or too uninterested to take back control of the party, it’s a hopeless cause. I’m not going to waste my energy on it.”

“My politics are still exactly the same as they were back in the 1980s when I first started setting up green political organisations,” he says. “I believe in the four pillars of green politics: ecological sustainability, social justice, democracy, and nonviolence. They’re my guiding principles, but they are no longer the guiding principles of the Greens.

“The issue for the Greens is they have no ability to talk to people outside that particular constituency,” he explains.

“These people have contempt for ordinary Australians. They’re university educated and predominantly from the inner city. They’re into identity politics. They’re professional, managerial elites and they don’t relate to … working-class Australians.”

“Unless somebody wakes up Labor and the Greens to the fact that they are not representing the people they purport to, the progressive side of politics is going to disintegrate in this country,” Hutton warns. “The Greens are going to stay at a sub-primary (vote) level, Labor is going to become increasingly unpopular out there and One Nation is going to cannibalise their vote. The left is going to have to take a very good look at ­itself if it wants to stay relevant in Australian politics.”

Source: Subscribe to The Australian | Newspaper home delivery, website, iPad, iPhone & Android apps

British Surgeon Involved in Castration Fetish Forum Who Amputated Own Legs Banned from Practicing Medicine | Genevieve Gluck

A former surgeon for the National Health Service of England who amputated his own legs to fulfill a sexual fetish has had his medical license revoked. Andrew Neil Hopper, 50, submerged his legs in dry ice for an excruciating eight hours, requiring amputation, after becoming involved in an international network of men who performed clandestine castration procedures in the production of pay-per-view pornography.

Hopper, a former consultant vascular surgeon, had claimed more than £466,000 in insurance payouts after the amputations by attributing his loss of limbs to sepsis. He pleaded guilty to fraud and three counts of possession of extreme pornographic images last year, was sentenced to 32 months in prison, and now has been barred from the medical profession by the General Medical Council (GMC).

Following his trial and sentencing, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) released the official case findings outlining how the fraud was exposed. During their inquiry, investigators discovered that Hopper had been a member of a castration fetish forum operated by Norwegian national Marius Gustavson – the ringleader of a “grisly and gruesome” criminal enterprise that sold footage of men being castrated and mutilated as pornographic content. The Eunuch Maker site, which operated on a pay-per-view subscription basis, had amassed over 22,000 registered users and brought in nearly £300,000 before it was shut down by authorities.

Despite the international coverage of the disturbing genital mutilation ring, media failed to note that Gustavson had been a prominent member of the LGBT activist community.

According to Gustavon’s LinkedIn profile, he was a volunteer and Senior Steward for London’s Pride organization between 2016 to 2019.

Prior to his relocation to London in 2012, Gustavson was Chairman of the Board for the Buskerud chapter of transactivist lobbying group The Norwegian Organization for Sexual and Gender Diversity, now known as FRI. Gustavson was involved in a leadership position at the organization from 2001 through 2007.

In 2018, The Norwegian Organization for Sexual and Gender Diversity (FRI) successfully lobbied the World Health Organization to officially depathologize fetishism, sadomasochism, and fetishistic transvestitism by removing them from the 11th revision of the International Classifications of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-11).

Source: British Surgeon Involved in Castration Fetish Forum Who Amputated Own Legs Banned from Practicing Medicine

“Australia not to provide a submission”: Inside DFAT’s management of the UN Special Rapporteur on violence against women and girls – The Women’s Advocate

More than a year of FOI requests and appeals has produced a broadly consistent picture of how the Australian Government manages its relationship with the UN Special Rapporteur on violence against women and girls, Reem Alsalem.

The entries on the document list from September to November 2024 confirm that Ms Alsalem’s letter to the Prime Minister and her 4 September statement on Tickle v Giggle were treated as requiring prompt attention.

The documents show that officials asked internally whether a reply to Ms Alsalem’s letter to the Prime Minister was required, and were advised that no response was needed because it was treated as a “courtesy letter” and no reply had been requested, although AGD could respond if it wished and DFAT would then “consider further”. Whether Australia subsequently replied remains unknown; the scope limitations and redactions do not allow us to determine this.

[S]ubject lines strongly suggest that, after a period of cross‑agency deliberation over February 2025, officials were acting on advice that Australia would not provide a submission in response to the Special Rapporteur’s call for inputs on sex‑based violence.

In October 2025, following an internal review of an earlier refusal, the Department of Employment and Workplace Relations released, in part, the transcript of a ‘Fireside Chat’ held on 18 September 2024 and jointly hosted by DEWR and the Department of Education for their staff. That transcript (LEX 1781) revealed that Ambassador Campbell had told staff that Ms Alsalem had “taken a fairly difficult position on transgender rights in a way that doesn’t conform with our views”, and that “we are directly engaging through various different mechanisms” to deal with those concerns.

The department determined, in accordance with section 11C(1) of the FOI Act, that publication of the information provided in relation to FOI request LEX 1781 would be unreasonable and therefore chose not to publish it on the department’s disclosure log. We publish it here in the public interest.

In the material released so far under LEX 13100, the only detailed meeting preparation disclosed is for engagement with Graeme Reid, the Independent Expert on sexual orientation and gender identity (IE SOGI), while comparable material for direct engagement with Ms Alsalem has not been released. Detailed talking points were prepared for a meeting with him, including references to disagreements between his mandate and that of Ms Alsalem as Special Rapporteur on violence against women and girls. Mr Reid’s mandate appears to be closer to the Government’s preferred framing on these issues.

On the documents released so far, Australia appears to have spoken about Ms Alsalem’s mandate, and around her mandate, but there is no disclosed record of substantive two‑way engagement with her on the Tickle v Giggle decision or her December 2024 call for inputs to understand, test or even seek to correct her views.

Source: “Australia not to provide a submission”: Inside DFAT’s management of the UN Special Rapporteur on violence against women and girls – The Women’s Advocate

Greens now party of pronouns, not the environment | The Australia | Julie Bindel

When a political party starts treating a good person, a hero even, as an evil bigot, it has become an authoritarian cult. Drew Hutton, who helped found the Australian Greens, was first suspended for pointing out that trans women are not, in fact, women. He was subsequently booted out, was reinstated on appeal, and finally resigned this week. 

Hutton became one of the countless victims of a crackdown on free speech, and the party, on a global scale, becoming obsessed with woke causes. His case is a classic example of a party that has become dogmatic, authoritarian and exerts top-down control over its members.

I have interviewed Greens in a number of countries during the past two years, looking at the purges, mainly of women but also of men, for wrong think. 

Massive divisions about extreme transgender ideology, the LGBTQIA2S+ politics of Green Youth, its support for the surrogacy trade, reframing prostitution as a job like any other, and being so obsessed with Palestine to be bordering on being pro-Hamas, the Greens have abandoned the planet for pronouns.

I contacted Hutton, whom I know from my previous research into the Greens, to ask how he was feeling about leaving. He said: “I am very sad to be leaving the party I founded and which was much of my life’s work, but I couldn’t retain any integrity if I had stayed in. It was started with such great hopes 34 years ago but has descended into an identity politics, authoritarian nightmare.”

Source: Subscribe to The Australian | Newspaper home delivery, website, iPad, iPhone & Android apps

Justice miscarried | The Spectator Australia

For more than five minutes of human history, society accepted biological reality as a simple fact. In primary schools everywhere, children were taught that XY chromosomes make someone male and XX meant female, and this understanding formed the basis of our laws. This foundation, once unshakeable, has been demolished in Australia by a combination of judicial decisions and legislative overreach – a process that culminated in the bizarre Full Federal Court decision in Tickle v. Giggle. Sall Grover, the founder of the women-only networking app Giggle for Girls, recently lost her appeal after being found to have discriminated against Roxanne Tickle, a biological male identifying as a woman. The court didn’t just uphold Justice Bromwich’s finding – it increased the penalties against Grover, delivering a watershed moment that enshrined a male’s right to self-identify as a woman over a woman’s right to single-sex spaces.

I recently rewatched the classic film Some Like It Hot. In it, men dress as women to escape the mob after witnessing a murder; the absurdity is the point. The joke relies entirely on the audience knowing that Tony Curtis and Jack Lemmon are still men beneath the wigs and dresses. At no point does anyone truly believe they have become women – that’s the entire premise of the comedy. Fast-forward to modern Australia, and the absurd script of a 1950s Hollywood farce has become a legally binding tragedy. To make matters worse, legacy media have lined up to applaud this travesty. The ABC published an article gaslighting its audience, insisting that the ruling against Grover was a victory for women’s rights. It takes a unique brand of journalistic delusion to describe a Federal Court decision fining a female entrepreneur for creating an app exclusively for biological women as a triumph for her sex.

Source: Justice miscarried | The Spectator Australia

Child sex offender Cameron Bloomfield given disability award after admin error – ABC News

In short:

A child sex offender was given a disability pride award after a Victorian government department administrative bungle.

Cameron Bloomfield was presented with the award in 2024 despite a past of repeat sexual offending.

The department rescinded the award a year later, after discovering they had missed details about his criminal history.

Source: Child sex offender Cameron Bloomfield given disability award after admin error – ABC News

Greens father figure Drew Hutton quits, vowing to back rival independents against former party | The Australian

Australian Greens co-founder Drew Hutton has quit the party in disgust, despite winning a costly legal battle to have his life membership reinstated.

Mr Hutton, 79, tendered his resignation late on Wednesday complaining that the “party left me” after he was raked over the coals for challenging its policies on transgender rights.

The Greens’ Queensland division fired a parting shot, saying it was saddened to see anyone giving voice to “billionaire-funded talking points that just seek to divide people”, further angering Mr Hutton.

He wrote in his letter of resignation: “As the party’s founder here in Queensland, it grieves me to have to do this but I feel I have no choice. I still believe in green politics but I feel the party has left me.”

Mr Hutton is now exploring how to set up a new “network” to endorse progressive independent candidates at the next federal election who would compete for the Greens’ vote.

After founding the Queensland Greens in 1991, Mr Hutton worked alongside his friend, Bob Brown, to set up the Australian Greens a year later. He remains an elder statesman of green politics in Australia, having also established the Lock the Gate movement to stop miners encroaching on productive farm lands.

He fell out bitterly with his home division in 2022 when he took to Facebook to decry “auth­oritarian and anti-democratic” disciplinary action that had been taken against feminist members of the Greens for questioning the party’s pro-trans positions.

Mr Hutton was cited for failing to expunge from the social media thread comments held to be offensive and in breach of party rules. The Queensland Greens’ constitution and arbitration committee found that while he had not personally denigrated transgender women, he did provide a platform for others to express transphobic views. Mr Hutton vehemently rejected this.

His membership of the party was suspended, triggering a stand-off as he appealed the finding against him. In July last year, the Greens’ state council upheld his expulsion, prompting him to speak out in The Australian against an “intolerant trans­gender and queer cult” that, he said, had hijacked the party.

Mr Hutton launched legal action in the Queensland Supreme Court and was vindicated when the Greens’ lawyers found he had been denied natural justice by the party’s internal processes. The Queensland Greens capitulated in March in an out-of-court settlement that restored his membership and paid $55,000 towards his legal costs.

Source: Subscribe to The Australian | Newspaper home delivery, website, iPad, iPhone & Android apps