UK gender medicine report on puberty blockers prompts reflection, outrage in Australia

A new policy in the United Kingdom to restrict the medical treatments available to trans and gender-diverse young people has raised fresh questions about Australia’s approach in one of the most sensitive areas of medicine and prompted a fierce defence from LGBTQ advocates.

British paediatrician Hilary Cass, who has spent four years on behalf of the National Health Service examining what is known as “affirming care” for transgender young people, published her final report on Tuesday night Australian time.
Over more than 300 pages, she cautions that there is “not a reliable evidence base upon which to make clinical decisions” in transgender medicine because the scientific evidence is of such poor quality.
The NHS announced last month that it would stop routinely prescribing puberty blockers to children with gender dysphoria and restrict their use to a clinical trial as a result of the Cass review.
In response to the report, Australian governments and health services backed their existing approach.
The report also prompted an immediate backlash from LGBTQ groups, who said it ignored the consensus of major medical bodies around the world and lacked relevance to Australia.
A parent from PAGD, a Victorian support group for families questioning affirming care, who wanted to remain anonymous for fear of public backlash if they were identified, said: “We hope this is a wake-up call to Australian medical and educational institutions and that we will finally see some caution and questioning around what is happening to our children.”
Mel Jefferies, a young woman who regrets her gender transition and has returned to her birth gender, also welcomed the Cass report.

Source: UK gender medicine report on puberty blockers prompts reflection, outrage in Australia

MONA ordered to allow men into ‘Ladies Lounge’ after discrimination complaint – Pulse Tasmania

MONA has been ordered to allow men into their ‘Ladies Lounge’ exhibit after a man complained about being excluded from the women’s-only space.

New South Wales resident Jason Lau lodged a discrimination complaint against the popular Tasmanian museum, which was upheld by the Tasmanian Civil and Administrative Tribunal.

The tribunal has given the museum 28 days to “cease refusing entry to the exhibit known as the Ladies Lounge at the Museum of Old and New Art by persons who do not identify as ladies”.

Tribunal Deputy President Richard Grueber said in his published decision that the case “involves conflict between an artwork which deliberately and overtly discriminates for artistic purpose and legislation which has the objective of prohibiting discrimination”.

He said Lau visited MONA in April of last year, paid the $35 entry fee and entered the museum – but was “not permitted entry into the Ladies Lounge was because of his gender”.

Grueber, in his comments, also criticised Kaechele and her 20+ female supporters for their conduct at the hearing, saying the way they left the tribunal building while dressed in blue power suits and dancing to Robert Palmer’s Simply Irresistible was “inappropriate, discourteous and disrespectful and at worst contumelious and contemptuous”.

MONA stated last month in a statement that their lawyers were prepared to fight and take the matter to the Supreme Court if necessary.

http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/tas/TASCAT/2024/58.html

Source: MONA ordered to allow men. into ‘Ladies Lounge’ after discrimination complaint – Pulse Tasmania

Women-only social media app Giggle for Girls taken to court by transgender woman Roxanne Tickle after her account was restricted – ABC News

  • In short: Transgender woman Roxanne Tickle is suing social media platform Giggle for Girls after she was excluded from the women-only app.
  • She is alleging unlawful discrimination on the basis of gender identity while the app’s founder has denied she is a woman.
  • What’s next? The hearing is expected to run for four days.

A transgender woman who was excluded from a women-only social media app should be awarded damages because the app’s founder has persistently denied she is a woman, a Sydney court has heard.

In a case before the Federal Court, Ms Tickle alleges unlawful discrimination on the basis of gender identity.

It is the first case alleging gender identity discrimination to be heard by the court since 2013 changes to the Sex Discrimination Act.

Ms Tickle’s counsel Georgina Costello KC told the court her client has a birth certificate stating her gender as female and has had gender affirming surgery.

She said the case law in respect of “sex, gender, man and woman” was clear that “sex and gender and man and woman are not binary categories … a person can change from one to another”.

It was not purely a biological question but partly psychological and partly social, Ms Costello said.

Barrister Bridie Nolan, representing the app and founder, said the app’s “vision” was for “a little corner of the internet where women from all over the world could have refuge away from males”.

Ms Nolan foreshadowed evidence from evolutionary biologist Colin Wright that “it was perfectly and objectively and scientifically reasonable for Ms Grover to identify [Ms Tickle] as male.”

Two small, opposing rallies gathered outside the Sydney court for the opening day.

“I appreciate the issues from this case give rise to strongly held-views and emotions,” Justice Robert Bromwich said.

He said he will deal with the case based on the issues arising from the pleadings and was not taking sides.

Source: Women-only social media app Giggle for Girls taken to court by transgender woman Roxanne Tickle after her account was restricted – ABC News

A Critical Perspective on Alex Greenwich’s Equality Legislation Amendment Bill | AWW Substack

Alex Greenwich’s Equality Bill is, frankly, alarming. What sets it apart from previous legislative efforts across Australia is not just its scope but its far reaching impact.

This Bill proposes to modify 23 existing Acts, affecting the community in every sector; from health, to employment, off-label drugs for minors, Crime, men in Rape/DV Shelters, superannuation, pimping, prostitution, males in female sports, males in female schools and accommodation, —impacting the majority of NSW’s population for the benefit of less than 0.01% (or .17% if you include nonbinary (people who feel they’re neither male or female).

At the heart of the controversy are changes to the Births, Deaths, and Marriages Act to facilitate self-identification, removing bans to commercial surrogacy, removing protections for prostitutes and allowing under 16s to easily access harmful irreversible gender drugs, without parental approval.

But the Bill’s ambitions don’t stop there; it also seeks to redefine aspects of the Crimes Act, especially concerning domestic violence, by criminalizing the act of “outing” someone’s past sexual orientation or gender identity—effectively making ‘misgendering’ a potential offence.

Consider the profound personal impacts of the Bill: A woman, whose husband of 30 years reveals he’s an AGP (a man who is aroused by the thought of himself as a woman) with a nappy fetish, may be prohibited from discussing this revelation with friends, family, and even in contexts like custody disputes where it could be highly relevant for child safeguarding. This protective stance prioritises the individual’s new identity, at the expense of all other concerns.

HERE’S HOW YOU CAN HELP:

1. Complete the survey, by 14 April, found here. Please select “oppose” to ALL questions. The survey should take no more than 3 minutes to complete. https://forms.office.com/Pages/ResponsePage.aspx?id=vp9hlIknxEOBgN2_R2mBwKUb-E9sLYtNjeESRyYnllxUNFdJOUJCVFk3QVI2QzhQSVRLTkhSUUw0Qy4u

2. Make a submission to the Equality Bill Inquiry by 14 April. https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/committees/inquiries/Pages/inquiry-details.aspx?pk=3041#tab-contactus

3. Write to your NSW state MP to tell them you OPPOSE the NSW Equality Legislation Amendment Bill and encourage your MP to oppose it, too.

The Equality Bill can be found here: https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/bill/files/18460/First%20Print.pdf

4. Contact us to volunteer to run small paper based petitions in your suburb. contact@aww.org.au

Source: A Critical Perspective on Alex Greenwich’s Equality Legislation Amendment Bill

Giggle case serious test of biological reality of women | The Australian

A transgender woman called Roxanne Tickle is taking Giggle for Girls CEO Sall Grover to the Federal Court next week, claiming discrimination on the grounds of gender identity.

Tickle has undergone gender-affirming surgery and has a Queensland birth certificate affirming female legal identity, and the Australian Human Rights Commission is the principal intervener. This case is very important because it could go to the High Court. Thus, it has far-reaching potential for sex discrimination law.

The story so far is as follows: Grover, an ambitious young business woman from Queensland, started an app called Giggle, designed for girls and women to connect, to find friends, flatmates, travelling companions and perhaps exchange tips on anything from pregnancy to makeup and fashion, whatever, “girly” sort of things, as the name “Giggle” would imply. What man would possibly be interested? Think again.

Grover is arguing on several levels, including Australia’s obligations to women under the UN Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination Against Women, ratified by Australia in 1983. She claims in her interview with Bindel that if she eventually wins, it will be an important international win for women’s rights, at least for those parts of the world that, like Australia, have signed up to CEDAW.

However, CEDAW was aimed at biological women and ratified by Australia before anyone thought about transgenderism. It was not necessary to define women. Grover is simply arguing that biological women, by virtue of their biology, have the right to protection and some safe and private spaces. She has a point.

Source: Giggle case serious test of biological reality of women | The Australian

Position paper on the definition of “woman”  | Special Rapporteur on violence against women and girls, Reem Alsalem

Background: In March 2024, I made an application to submit an amicus brief in the case of Roxanne Tickle versus Giggle for Girls Pty Ltd & Anor (NSD1148/22). I was not granted leave to intervene by the Federal Court of Australia on grounds that the submission was made late. I was asked instead to provide input to the Australian Human Rights Commission, which is intervening in this case, on the meaning of the word “woman” in the Convention on theElimination of All Forms of  Discrimination against Women and Girls (CEDAW) by the 18th of March, which I have done. I conveyed my expectation that given my application, the Australian Human Rights Commissioner would bring my submission to the attention of the Australian Federal Court and other parties. At the time of sending my submission to the Commissioner, I had copied the respondents’ solicitor on the communication, acknowledging their assistance to date in navigating the Australian federal legal system up to that point.. The below position maintains the core message of the input sent to the Commissioner, while expanding some of the supporting arguments.

4 April 2024

Source: 20240404-Statement-sr-vawg-cedaw-convention.pdf

Truth cuts deep when it’s transgender mastectomy | Gender Clinic News

On ABC TV, the public broadcaster with a $1 billion-plus budget and nationwide reach, presenter Joe O’Brien interviewed journalist Patricia Karvelas, a rising star of the network. “Facts” was the word she hammered, again and again.

“Before you’re 18, Joe, there’s no surgery at all, for anyone under 18, there’s nothing like that,” Ms Karvelas said. “I feel like we’ve lost the facts in this conversation, we are having a very toxic conversation which is incredibly hurtful to a tiny minority of [trans young] people who are going through something incredibly difficult.

“And we are also getting basic facts wrong, if you’re under 18, you don’t have surgery, people should get across the facts here. I am across these facts, it’s a community [of trans people] I have quite a lot to do with…”

In fact, all three stages of the so-called Dutch protocol of gender medicalisation have been (and still are) available for minors in Australia—puberty blockers, synthetic cross-sex hormones and surgery. Family Court cases making it easier to get these medical interventions have been reported as good news by the ABC and celebrated by human rights lobbies.

Ms Karvelas and her political journalist tribe got it wrong. It didn’t stop her being chosen to present an ABC TV Four Corners investigation into the only major children’s hospital in Australia cautious about gender medicalisation. The July 2023 TV program amplified the dogma that any approach other than the “gender-affirming” treatment model is likely to do harm.

. . .

The headline in Guardian Australia was, “Morrison stands by Katherine Deves and wrongly claims ‘young adolescents’ can have gender-confirmation surgery.” The article cited Healthdirect.

[L]et’s list some of the procedures that are lawfully available to minors in Australia—

“Double mastectomy; phalloplasty (creation of a pseudo-penis); hysterectomy; bilateral salpingectomy (removal of the fallopian tubes); and vaginoplasty (creation of a pseudo-vagina).”

This is not an exhaustive list4. It comes from the 2018 re Matthew case, in which a single judge, Judith Rees, made the momentous decision to cut back the Family Court’s supervision of surgery for minors with gender dysphoria. Until that ruling is challenged and set aside, it is no longer necessary to make an application to the court before this surgery, unless there is disagreement between parents or doctors about, for example, the capacity of the child to give informed consent.

So, Ms Deves and Mr Morrison were right, and the political journos were wrong.

At the time of writing, the Healthdirect webpage states that to get gender-affirming surgery, you must “be over the age of 16 for top surgery, or 18 for bottom surgery.” The source of this claim is not given; there is no reference to Australia’s family law, which makes no such age distinction.

In two short sentences, it makes two starkly pseudoscientific claims—“Gender-confirmation surgery (formerly called gender-reassignment surgery) transfers people with gender dysphoria to their desired biological sex. It is also possible to change one’s sex by taking hormones [Emphasis added].”

Source: Truth cuts deep when it’s transgender mastectomy

The nihilism of nonbinary – spiked

When you ask nonbinaries what they mean by this, the response usually boils down to men saying they feel kinda feminine sometimes, and women saying they kinda don’t. It’s not exactly The Communist Manifesto. When you point out that some men and women have felt this way since time immemorial, without feeling the need to turn it into a political cause, nonbinary males become aggressive and nonbinary females become sulky.

If, like me, you prefer to identify as non-lunatic, you might be tempted to dismiss the nonbinary phenomenon as a passing fad, like the Tamagotchi ‘egg’ toys popular among children a couple of decades ago. But there’s a difference between the idea of nonbinary and fads like Tamagotchis, especially among the young. Schools banned Tamagotchis in the 1990s because they were a distraction. This time, our public institutions, from multinational corporations to medical bodies, are actively promoting the idea that you can be neither male nor female.

The vague, indefinable, neither-nor quality of ‘nonbinary’ certainly appeals to the narcissists among us. It offers even more opportunity for forensic self-obsession than the old trans identity does. And that’s saying something.

No one sums up this narcissism better than Alok Vaid-Menon, perhaps the most prominent nonbinary campaigner around today. He first gained a name for himself in the mid-2010s for performing execrable ‘poetry’ while dressed in garish women’s clothes that showed off a body hairy enough to put Burt Reynolds to shame.

Once upon a time it was permissible to laugh at a hairy bloke squeezed into a cocktail dress who takes himself much too seriously. But not today. Vaid-Menon’s pronouncements are treated with the kind of reverence once accorded to religious leaders.

In 2021, an old social-media post of his resurfaced in which he also weighed into the debate about single-sex spaces. Instead of insisting that trans-identified males pose no risk to women and girls, as most trans activists do, he took a more original approach. He claimed that young girls aren’t as innocent as we think. ‘We have to challenge the idea that there is a perfect victim’, he said. ‘I believe in the radical notion that little girls, like the rest of us, are complicated people… Little girls are also queer, trans, kinky, deviant.’ He added that ‘no one is a perfect flower that can be corrupted’. This is sinister stuff.

[F]or an increasing number of ‘trans’ people, and above all their nonbinary successors, the most powerful motivation for ‘transitioning’ has never really been the desire to mimic the opposite sex. Rather it is driven by something far more self-destructive – to mutilate or erase the physical signs of their bodies’ sex.

Some nonbinaries have given the game away however. About 10 years ago, those who did acknowledge this desire to mutilate their sexed bodies explicitly embraced the idea of being nullo or neutrois.

An example of how overpowering this obsession can become was provided in January this year, when two men who ran a ‘nullo’ cult in Finsbury Park in London were given jail sentences. The trial revealed that the men involved had carried out and filmed procedures to remove one of their member’s penis and left leg, and another’s nipple.

Men who want to become neutrois tend to have their genitals removed, while most women tend to want to have their breasts removed – although there have been cases of others having their vaginas sewn up and their clitorises removed.

Neutrois aspirants of both sexes often want to have their nipples removed, too, so powerful is their desire to smooth out and erase the existence of a sexed body.

The nonbinary cause is born of a psychological disturbance.

In 2023, the world’s leading trans healthcare organisation, WPATH, added nullo, neutrois and ‘eunuch’ to its ever-expanding list of gender identities. In doing so, it was merely formalising a view widely held across the nonbinary ‘community’. In the US, some surgeons now actively promote the fact that they offer a ‘nullo’ service.

The trans lobby is already responsible for exacerbating the mental-health problems of troubled teenagers, feeding them the myth they might be born in the wrong body. But the nonbinary phase of transgenderism is perhaps even more dangerous.

We need to resist the trans and nonbinary agenda. We need to challenge its claims to be liberating and progressive, and expose its creepy, nihilistic roots. To allow or encourage the modification and mutilation of young bodies is not a win for social justice or equality. It is accommodating pathological behaviour.

Source: The nihilism of nonbinary – spiked

 

Elon Musk’s X sues the Australian government in ‘free speech’ battle after its ‘world-first’ e-Safety Commissioner ordered an ‘offensive’ post to be taken down | Daily Mail Online

Elon Musk‘s X is suing the Australian government after its ‘world-first’ E-Safety Commissioner ordered an ‘offensive’ post to be removed from the platform.

Daily Mail Australia last week revealed that X faced an $800,000 fine if it did not remove a post written by Canadian man Chris Elston, in which he misgendered and made ‘disparaging’ remarks about an Australian citizen, Teddy Cook.

Cook, 45, a female-to-male trans man who has advocated for taxpayer-funded surgeries for all transgender Australians, was controversially appointed to a World Health Organisation expert panel.

Mr Elston’s alleged offence came when he shared a Daily Mail story in late February about Mr Cook.

Cook’s now-private social media posts are awash with X-rated material, including public nudity, bondage parties, trans orgies and even a photo of a man apparently having sex with a dog.

It is understood Cook lodged the complaint with the e-Safety Commissioner himself.

UN trans expert Teddy Cook is pictured

In a colossal back-fire for the e-Safety Commissioner, that post alone has been seen over 140,000 times and a concerted campaign to re-share it by others has racked up over a million views.

The eSafety Commissioner lauds itself as the ‘first government agency committed to keeping its citizens safer online’.

It is run by former Twitter Director of Public Policy, Australia & SE Asia, Julie Inman-Grant, who receives an annual salary of almost $445,000.

Ms Grant, an American who began her career working in the US Congress, worked at Microsoft for 17 years, eventually rising to the role of Global Director for Safety and Privacy Policy and Outreach before she joined Twitter.

Source: Elon Musk’s X sues the Australian government in ‘free speech’ battle after its ‘world-first’ e-Safety Commissioner ordered an ‘offensive’ post to be taken down | Daily Mail Online

Hundreds of NSW women get legal help for workplace sexual harassment and discrimination | Legal Aid News – March 2024

Women needing help with sexual harassment and discrimination in the workplace because of pregnancy, sex and disability have dominated the first year of demand for Legal Aid NSW’s new Respect at Work Legal Service (RAWLS).

New data showed high numbers of women seeking help with workplace sexual harassment and discrimination, with over 800 workers seeking help and 1153 advice and representation services provided since the service, RAWLS, began in January 2023.

Of those services, 71 per cent were for female clients with the most common complaints being disability discrimination (27 per cent) followed by sexual harassment (20 per cent) and sex discrimination (14 per cent).

Source: Legal Aid News – March 2024