SPAIN: Man Convicted of Abusing Two Women Requests Pardon After Declaring Transgender Identity – Reduxx

A man in Spain convicted of violent crimes against two women has changed his name and sex marker in an apparent bid to seek clemency from the government on the basis of his newfound gender identity.

Both women have described Antonio as a “psychopath, manipulative, and very intelligent.” They have described their abuse as having been physical, psychological, and verbal.

Within months of the legislation’s passing, multiple cases have already emerged out of Spain in which violent males have taken to changing their names and gender markers in an effort to get preferential treatment by the justice system.

Last fall, a man who beat his female partner for opposing his transition successfully avoided charges of sex-based violence by legally changing his identification to “female” and adopting a woman’s name. Núria González López, the legal advisor for the victim, told Reduxx at the time: “Women’s safety appears to be less important than men’s feelings.”

In July, a sadistic man who bludgeoned his cousin to death before sexually desecrating her corpse requested transfer to a women’s prison after altering his identification and claiming to be female. Lorena Robaina, formerly known as Jonathan de Jesús, is currently serving 38 years in prison for the sick crime.

Most recently, it was revealed that a violent male convict who was transferred to a women’s prison after claiming to be transgender had reportedly impregnated a female inmate at the Alicante Cumplimiento Penitentiary Center in the Fontcalent region. The inmate was originally detained in the men’s ward of the Alicante prison for repeated violent criminal convictions, including kidnapping and robbery.


Source: SPAIN: Man Convicted of Abusing Two Women Requests Pardon After Declaring Transgender Identity – Reduxx

Calls for courts to better acknowledge family violence in property settlement cases – ABC News

The Federal Government wants instances of family violence to be given greater consideration in property settlements between separating couples, to better recognise the ongoing financial impact of abuse.

Family violence has been a factor for courts in ruling on the division of assets in the past, but it has never been explicitly included in the Family Law Act.

That has led to concerns about how the principles are applied, and whether there is inconsistency across the country based of different interpretations of previous court judgements.

Lawyer and domestic and family violence prevention advocate Angela Lynch described it as an important change.

“Women’s groups and domestic violence groups have called for these changes over decades because what they have seen is the enormous impact that family violence has on the financial and economic outcomes for women after they separate from violent marriages and relationships,” she said.

Source: Calls for courts to better acknowledge family violence in property settlement cases – ABC News

Class Action Dismissed: Evaluators Can Lie about Mothers with Impunity

On the front page of the Denver Gazette in large bold letters, the headline reads: “Judge rules parenting evaluators get immunity”.

Well, not exactly. The judge just dismissed a class action lawsuit filed by a group of mothers against one evaluator. He based his ruling on a law that grants quasi-judicial immunity to court-appointed officials. But, yes, by dismissing the lawsuit, he is affirming that all evaluators get immunity.

The Gazette reported on the filing of this lawsuit in March: Class-action suit filed against parental evaluator who said he disbelieves 90% of domestic violence allegations, but that apparently did not merit front page status. The dismissal did—a very clear, public message to mothers (and their attorney) from the OBN (Old Boy Network) via MSM (mainstream media) to not to truck with that foolishness anymore! After all, reports by biased evaluators play an important role in keeping fathers empowered in the family: they give the judges something to hang their hat on when switching custody.

Immunity is part and parcel of the rigged, sexist system. Of course the OBN is going to ensure immunity for anyone who helps to keep men empowered in the family. Evaluators would be useless if they were able to be held accountable for their lies about mothers and concealment of abuse by fathers.

Lastly, there is some good news! The evaluator in this class-action lawsuit was suspended: Colorado custody evaluator suspended amid criticism of evaluation industry.

One down, thousands to go. Unfortunately, there will always be more to take their place…

Source: Class Action Dismissed: Evaluators Can Lie about Mothers with Impunity

Family Law Action Group | Victims of Domestic Violence & Family Violence | Victims of the Family Court System

The Family Law Action Group (FLAG) was established by a group of Family Law self-represented litigants in 2019 in response to frequent (almost daily) reports from victims of the Family Law System. We are here to do something about Judicial Bias and Corruption and matters of Victim and Child Safety in family court cases.

Source: Family Law Action Group | Victims of Domestic Violence & Family Violence | Victims of the Family Court System

BBC Exposé: Family Court Is Inciting International Exodus of Mothers Seeking Safety

BBC aired an investigative report this week exposing how Family Court is provoking an exodus of mothers fleeing internationally into hiding after being court-ordered to hand their children over to abusive, violent, and child molesting fathers. It also brings to light the resulting trauma suffered by mothers—the damage done to their physical and mental health by this systemic persecution, with some cases culminating in death.

Mums on the run are being aided by a secret network of collaborators, a kind of international underground for women and children escaping to freedom from their abusive exes and Family Court—shades of slaves fleeing their masters a couple centuries ago.

BBC reports that there are hundreds of mothers who’ve fled from UK to Cyprus, Tunisia, Thailand, and elsewhere. They found nine who agreed to speak with them on the condition of anonymity. Four were living in northern Cyprus, so the reporter flew there to talk to them.

The Republic of Cyprus is a small, independent island nation off the southern coast of Turkey where the locals speak Greek, but the northeastern section of the island is a Turkish territory. It is not recognized internationally as a State and there is no extradition treaty, so it affords women some protection.

The report clearly invites the reader to believe and sympathize with the mothers, not fathers. It leaves no doubt they were seriously wronged and their fleeing into hiding was justified. There was sympathy for all the mothers who died, even those who resorted to the unthinkable and ended their lives.

This is great, however…

The crisis is being portrayed as a national scandal with hundreds of mothers fleeing from the UK, but really it is an international outrage. All the talk of UK mothers and not one mention of the thousands of mothers all over the world experiencing the same horrific treatment in family courts.

Source: BBC Exposé: Family Court Is Inciting International Exodus of Mothers Seeking Safety

Judge who berated and jailed a domestic abuse victim gets her day in court—and it’s not pretty

Appointed to the bench in 2005 by then-Governor Jeb Bush, the Florida County Judge Jerri Collins found herself in front of the Florida Supreme Court on Wednesday, being publicly reprimanded—live on TV. This was Judge Collins’ penalty for her repugnant treatment of a domestic abuse victim who failed to show up to her abuser’s trial.

The victim in this case said it was anxiety that caused her not to show up. In response, Judge Jerri Collins told the victim:

“You think you’re going to have anxiety now? You haven’t even seen anxiety,” 

The victim replied:

“I’m just not in a good place right now.”

“I’m homeless now. I’m living at my parents’ house,” the woman said as she sobbed. “Everything has been shut off. I just sold everything I own.”

Collins responded with veracious scorn:

“And violating your court order did not do anything for you. I find you in contempt of court. I hereby sentence you to three days in the county jail,” said the judge.

While being taken into custody the victim cried out:

“Judge, I’ll do anything. Please, please!” the woman begged. “I have a 1-year-old son and I’m trying to take care of him by myself. I’m begging you, please, please!”

Collins was unmoved. The victim was sentenced to three days in jail. Her abuser got 16 days.

It’s too bad former Florida District Attorney Angela Corey wan’t publicly reprimanded for her treatment of single mother and domestic violence victim Marissa Alexander, who fired a shot into the air to keep her serial abuser husband from attacking her and was sentenced to 20 years in prison. Florida has a long way to go. This is hopefully the start of new direction. No victim of domestic violence should ever be treated so cruel and disrespectfully. Ever.  

Source: Judge who berated and jailed a domestic abuse victim gets her day in court—and it’s not pretty

Aussie landlords reveal secret renter checklists for tenants | news.com.au — Australia’s leading news site

Aussie landlords have revealed how they determine whether someone will be a good tenant – and some of their methods are very unusual.

These are pretty standard factors that you would expect landlords to be looking out for but there were also some strange, and downright shocking, suggestions in the comments.

One landlord advised against having “single women as tenants”.

“You run a risk with DV problems, boyfriends moving in etc., especially with the new DV laws,” he wrote.

In NSW, there are a number of rules in place to protect victims of domestic violence who are also renters.

Under the law, if a tenant or their dependent child are in circumstances of domestic violence, they can end their tenancy immediately without being penalised.

This means that the landlord cannot issue the victim with breach fees or costs for property damage caused by the domestic violence perpetrator.

A landlord is also not allowed to list information about a tenant in a tenancy database when the tenant has terminated the agreement in circumstances of domestic violence.

Source: Aussie landlords reveal secret renter checklists for tenants | news.com.au — Australia’s leading news site

Family courts: Children forced into contact with fathers accused of abuse – BBC News

Dozens of children have been forced into contact with fathers accused of abuse, a study has found.

In some cases in the research, revealed for the first time by the BBC, the fathers were convicted paedophiles.

In all cases, fathers had used a disputed concept in court known as “parental alienation”.

Separately, the same concept has been cited in the deaths of women after family courts allowed fathers accused of abuse to apply for contact.

The BBC investigation found five mothers died – some taking their own lives and one having a heart attack.

All the fathers in the England-wide study, carried out by the University of Manchester and reported by the BBC, had responded in court to abuse allegations with the parental alienation concept – in which they claimed the mothers had turned the child against them without good reason.

Dr Elizabeth Dalgarno, who led the research, says the concept is a “handy tool for abusers” and its acceptance by courts is a “national scandal”.

The 45 mothers of the children in the University of Manchester study all reported serious health problems which they believed were linked to the stress of family court proceedings – including miscarriages, heart attacks and suicidal thoughts.

Source: Family courts: Children forced into contact with fathers accused of abuse – BBC News

Oh No! New Coercive Control Law “Contorted” against Mom

A Connecticut judge just granted a Restraining Order to an abusive father that prohibits a loving mother from having any contact at all with her three children.

That should shock no woman who has ever stepped foot in a family court—or known anyone who has.

But there was a twist in this case. The judge contorted the newly expanded domestic violence law, which now includes coercive control, to use against Karen. He issued the Restraining Order [RO] on the grounds that she was using coercive control on the children by causing them to disclose abuse by the father. Terms already used for this include: coaching, brainwashing, alienating, manipulating, etc.

Activists have been fighting the use of parental alienation claiming it is not scientific or legal. Now they have something that is scientific and legal that describes the same behavior. Was this the plan? Will coercive control turn out to be the most difficult for women to defend against?

Karen’s story shows how DV and child protection laws not only don’t help, they can hurt.

Source: (2) Oh No! New Coercive Control Law “Contorted” against Mom

Australia’s family law overhaul a step closer as inquiry endorses focus on child’s best interest | Law (Australia) | The Guardian

A dramatic overhaul of the nation’s family laws which puts more focus on a child’s best interests than on shared parental responsibility, is set to go ahead.

A multi-partisan Senate committee has considered amendments to the Family Law Act and, while it is calling for further changes, overall it wants the bill passed.

The centrepiece of the proposed legislation is the repeal of the presumption of equal shared parental responsibility – often misinterpreted as a presumption of equal shared parental time.

The committee found that “a history of family violence, abuse and neglect as a general consideration in determining what is in the child’s best interests” was critical, and that language and concepts used to “better recognise and protect the right of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children to enjoy their culture” should be included.

There should also be more consideration of the child’s perspective, including if a child objects to a return order under The Hague convention on child abduction. The convention was put in place to stop non-custodial parents abducting children, but has been misused against victims fleeing domestic violence with their children.

The committee also recommended that safeguards be introduced to stop alleged perpetrators misusing subpoenas to gain access to their alleged victims’ personal information, including counselling notes, medical files and home addresses.

The misuse of subpoenas is part of a broader problem known as legal systems abuse, where alleged domestic violence perpetrators representing themselves in family court drag out litigation, introduce vexatious applications and force the victim-survivor to repeatedly be in the same venue as their abuser,

There are concerns men’s rights activists are coaching unrepresented parties on ways to exploit court processes.

The chief executive officer of Single Mother Families Australia, Terese Edwards, said legal systems abuse also extended to child support payments, pointing to online forums advising men how to minimise their payments.

[Ed: Unfortunately without sex specific language and a presumption in favour of mothers who are primary caregivers, any safeguards will continue to be used  against women rather than for the protection of mother and child.]

Source: Australia’s family law overhaul a step closer as inquiry endorses focus on child’s best interest | Law (Australia) | The Guardian