Inside the Gay Tech Mafia | WIRED

All entries on Feminist Legal Clinic’s News Digest Blog are extracts from news articles and other publications, with the source available at the link at the bottom. The content is not originally generated by Feminist Legal Clinic and does not necessarily reflect our views.

No one can say exactly when, or if, gay men started running Silicon Valley.

[W]hen I call up a well-connected hedge fund manager to ask his thoughts about what is sometimes referred to in industry circles as the “gay tech mafia,” he audibly yawns. “Of course,” he says. “This has always been the case.”

And it is absolutely the case now, he adds, when gay men are running influential companies in Silicon Valley and maintain entire social calendars with scarcely a straight man, much less a woman, in sight. “Of course the gay tech mafia exists,” he continues. “This is not some Illuminati conspiracy theory. And you do not have to be gay to join. They like straight guys who sleep with them even more.”

Sure, there were gay men in high places: Peter Thiel, Tim Cook, Sam Altman, Keith Rabois, the list went on. But the idea that they were operating some kind of shadowy cabal seemed born entirely of homophobia.

At an AI conference in Los Angeles, an engineer casually referred to a top AI firm’s offices, more than once, as “twink town.”

One San Francisco investor tells me that he believes the Thiel Fellowship is a training ground for gay industry leaders.

[O]ne afternoon in late November, spend nearly an hour texting one . . . account owner over Signal who agrees to speak to me only if I keep his handle secret.

This person describes the Valley as a place known for “ecstasy, psychedelic fueled gay sex stuff.” Has he experienced any of it himself? No. But he knows people who have—people who are “pretty afraid” and “young af.” He won’t name names, won’t connect me to anyone, but he swears that any negative rumor I’ve heard about gay men in Silicon Valley is true. He suggests a conspiracy so sprawling it rivals QAnon and implicates the entire US government.

Finally, frustrated by his evasiveness, I ask what he thinks will happen if he tells me what he knows. “I truly believe,” he says, “killed.”

The problem with conspiracy theories, even offensive ones, is that they are rarely wholly invented.

Most of the people who speak to me for this story do so on the condition that their names be kept confidential.

In 2022, a popular anonymous tech insider X account, Roon, tweeted that it was “crazy how venture capitalists have reinvented the Roman system of pederasty.”

I’m told to connect with Joel, a gay man who works in tech and who spent a lot of time among the older in-group of powerful gay men in Silicon Valley, more than a decade ago.

When I ask Joel to explain how the gay tech mafia works, he tells me that it’s similar to people who “went to the same college or came from a similar background or a similar town.”

Joel tells me about the parties at the time—the exact specifics of which remain off the record. But they were, in summary, what you might expect.

I tell Joel that I’ve heard from some young men in the tech industry who feel pressured to sleep around to get ahead. Was that true in his experience? “Mmmmm,” he says, and pauses. Then he bursts out laughing. “I mean, in all of this, there are weird gray areas. It can be very sexual. It is not all professional. A lot of people have dated or slept with each other.” He had experienced a kind of coercion firsthand. “I definitely felt pressured to do—not overtly illegal things. But they walked the line.”

The exchange of sex and status may not be the reason these men rose so quickly, but it can be a factor—if only because sex, as he puts it, “makes people become closer rapidly.”

Source: Inside the Gay Tech Mafia | WIRED

Why do men sexually harass women at work? Science offers two explanations – but only one of them holds up | The Conversation

There are two ways to understand sexual harassment in the workplace, but one of them is more scientific than the other.

On one view, sexual harassment – as the name implies – is all about sexuality. According to the evolutionary psychology research program, men and women have evolved different psychological mechanisms to solve the different challenges they faced to successfully reproduce back in the Pleistocene epoch.

For men, these adaptive mechanisms include a greater interest in casual sex, and a tendency to mistakenly conclude that women are sexually interested in them. Women, in contrast, evolved to be more sensitive to potential threats to their sexual autonomy – and therefore perceive men’s advances as harassing.

But for social science scholars informed by the gender hierarchy – the idea that men hold more power and status than women – sexual harassment is “an expression of workplace sexism, not sexuality or sexual desire”. It is a mechanism for preserving work roles as masculine terrain, and pushing back against threats to men’s higher status within a workplace.

It might be tempting to think one scientific view is preferred over another for political reasons: he likes the evolutionary psychology account because he is a misogynist; or she likes the gender hierarchy account because she is blinded by her feminist ideology.

These accusations don’t get us very far. Fortunately, the philosophy of science gives us three well-established criteria for what makes for a good scientific explanation.

In our recently published research, we used these three criteria for a good scientific explanation to compare the evolutionary psychology and gender hierarchy maintenance accounts of workplace sexual harassment. So what did we find?

First, we found that the gender hierarchy maintenance explanation was clearly superior when it came to identifying causes that make sense of a broad range of workplace sexual harassment phenomena.

Evolutionary psychology makes sense of sexual coercion and some forms of unwanted sexual attention, to be sure. But research shows these kinds of behaviours almost invariably go hand-in-hand with sexist jokes, crude sexual remarks and sexually degrading imagery, such as porn.

None of these behaviours are plausibly about trying to gain sexual favours, even though some are sexual in nature. These behaviours are called “gender harassment” –which is the most common form of sexual harassment.

Unlike evolutionary psychology, gender hierarchy maintenance can explain all three forms of harassment. Demands for sexual favours, sexist remarks and requests for note-taking can all be understood as behaviours that reinforce traditional gender roles and confer greater status and authority to men.

Our research points to the value of understanding workplace sexual harassment through the lens of gender hierarchy maintenance. This offers hope for the future of workplace culture: it suggests men are not essentially predisposed to be sexual harassers, with little that can be done to alter their evolved natures.

Instead, sexual harassment is best understood as a consequence of our current social and cultural environment. And this is something we can shape to facilitate a better and safer future at work.

Source: Why do men sexually harass women at work? Science offers two explanations – but only one of them holds up

Former NSW prison officers say system protects abusers and silences women – ABC News

The ABC has obtained internal documents showing Corrective Services NSW (CSNSW) received multiple reports of former prison officer Scott Hawken making unwanted sexual advances towards female staff, three years before he raped a colleague in 2022. 

Hawken’s case was one of more than 64 matters of sexual assault or harassment involving CSNSW staff reported to the Professional Standards branch between January 2020 and April 2023, according to records obtained by the ABC.

The ABC has spoken to nine current and former correctional officers. 

Most declined to be identified for fear of retribution, but all described a toxic workplace culture that discouraged reporting and shielded senior officers.

One who did speak publicly is Kirsty Prince, a junior officer who medically retired in December.

Ms Prince said that, after she reported a senior correctional officer, she was labelled by her colleagues as a “career destroyer” and “a dog”.

“You’re a blue family now — you stick together,” she said new recruits were often told, blue being a reference to the corrections uniform.

In late 2022, Ms Prince reported a senior officer, Adrian Willis, for sending a photograph of his genitals to her, her 12-year-old son and three other minors.

As a survivor of sexual abuse as a teenager, she said she immediately recognised the seriousness of the image.

“It was the start of a grooming process,” she said.

Within days of reporting the matter, she said her confidentiality was breached by a senior manager she had confided in, and “everyone knew”.

“When it comes time to negotiate my payout, I will refuse to sign an NDA and I’m willing to walk away with nothing. This matters to me because women sign NDAs and those responsible never face consequences.”

In recent years, New South Wales prisons have been in a deepening crisis following a series of sexual misconduct scandals involving senior correctional officers, including former senior officer Wayne Astill, who was convicted of sexually assaulting more than a dozen inmates.

The crisis resulted in a major inquiry in 2023 that examined and found the culture, practices, and procedures within the jail, and the performance of several correctional officers and their managers, were inadequate and inappropriate.

Source: Former NSW prison officers say system protects abusers and silences women – ABC News

NSW government’s challenge to landmark strip-search case could threaten justice for ‘thousands’ – Lawyers Weekly

All entries on Feminist Legal Clinic’s News Digest Blog are extracts from news articles and other publications, with the source available at the link at the bottom. The content is not originally generated by Feminist Legal Clinic and does not necessarily reflect our views.

The NSW government has signalled its intention to appeal the landmark strip-search class action ruling, which examined the lawfulness of police strip searches at music festivals.

Last month, the Supreme Court of NSW heard Raya Meredith’s account of being subjected to an invasive strip search at Splendour in the Grass in 2018, during which she was ordered to remove her tampon, lift and expose parts of her body, and bend over.

Ultimately, no drugs were found on her.

Justice Dina Yehia awarded Meredith $93,000 in damages, finding that the officer’s actions went “far beyond” what was objectively necessary and describing her experience as “humiliating treatment while at a total loss of liberty”.

Slater & Gordon, which led the class action lawsuit that expanded to include hundreds of others alleging they were unlawfully strip-searched by police between 2016 and 2022, had been negotiating a settlement between the state and these claimants.

However, the national law firm revealed that the state of NSW has “now signalled an intention to appeal the judgment”.

William Zerno, senior associate in class actions at Slater & Gordon, warned that an appeal would only delay justice for those thousands affected and subjected to these unlawful strip searches.

Source: NSW government’s challenge to landmark strip-search case could threaten justice for ‘thousands’ – Lawyers Weekly

How Epstein’s influence shaped the exclusion of women in STEM

IAll entries on Feminist Legal Clinic’s News Digest Blog are extracts from news articles and other publications, with the source available at the link at the bottom. The content is not originally generated by Feminist Legal Clinic and does not necessarily reflect our views.

In 2018, an elite group of academics and scientists planned to gather for an exclusive retreat at a luxury farm in the woods of Connecticut. The guests had been hand-picked by prominent New York literary agent John Brockman, who frequently hosted similar salons for luminaries in science, technology and media. 

The problem? Brockman had included two women on the list, and his staunch supporter and biggest funder wanted them out. 

“John, the old conferences did not care about diversity. I suggest you not either,” Jeffrey Epstein wrote in response to an email about the programming. “The women are all weak, and a distraction sorry.” 

In reply, Brockman justified the women’s inclusion, and says they’d been a part of a related book about AI, which needed to be inclusive to sell. “Today, it’s impossible to get a publisher to buy such a book with essays by 25 men and no women,” he wrote. 

Larry Summers, the former president of Harvard University, who emailed with Epstein hundreds of times, made a joke in one email about how “half the IQ In world was possessed by women without mentioning they are more than 51 percent of population.” 

In another exchange, Epstein and Jeremy Rubin, a bitcoin developer and MIT researcher, went back and forth over whether there are any games that women are actually better at than men. It would be “interesting to attempt to make an intellectually stimulating game where women outperform men,” Rubin wrote in 2016. “Unless women are inherently inferior to the maximally talented man at all tasks ;).”

For women like Lauren Aulet, a neuroscientist and assistant professor at the University of Massachusetts, the files revealed conversations that were more brash than she expected. “I think what was most shocking was simply how blatant and explicit the misogyny was.”

“We have this narrative that explicit misogyny is something from the ’50s and ’60s, and what we have now is like implicit bias and microaggressions,” she said, adding: “I think this made clear that explicit misogyny is still out there in science and in academia, it’s just perhaps behind closed doors.”

Source: How Epstein’s influence shaped the exclusion of women in STEM

Nurses win huge battle after woke NHS made them share changing room with trans woman | UK | News | Express.co.uk

All entries on Feminist Legal Clinic’s News Digest Blog are extracts from news articles and other publications, with the source available at the link at the bottom. The content is not originally generated by Feminist Legal Clinic and does not necessarily reflect our views.

EXCLUSIVE: Trailblazing NHS nurses – known as the Magnificent Seven – have won a landmark biological sex victory plunging the NHS into crisis.

In a landmark judgment, an employment tribunal ruled that County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust had unlawfully discriminated against and harassed the female medics by requiring them to share changing rooms with a biological male.

The ruling confirms the Trust’s policy allowing men into women’s spaces is unlawful and violates the rights of its female staff.

The tribunal’s judgement said: “By requiring the claimants to share a changing room with a biological male trans woman…the respondent engaged in unwanted conduct related to sex and gender reassignment which had the effect of violating the dignity of the claimants and creating for the claimants a hostile, humiliating and degrading environment.”

The landmark judgement is a major victory for those who have campaigned to protect and uphold women’s rights in the wake of last year’s Supreme Court ruling.

Nurses working on a day care ward at Darlington Memorial Hospital took their NHS bosses to a tribunal to lay bare in detail how they had been left crippled by fear after Rose Henderson, a biological male identifying as a woman, was given free access to their safe space.

Action came after Rose, a male nurse identifying as female, menacingly loitered as they changed.

The group action also included Karen Danson, 46, a survivor of childhood sexual abuse, Annice Grundy, 56, Lisa Lockey, 52, Carly Hoy, 31, Tracey Hooper, 47, and Jane Peveller, 51, and was backed by Harry Potter author and women’s rights activist J.K. Rowling.

The nurses’ evidence opened with the testimony of Ms Danson who described a disturbing encounter in which Rose, wearing revealing boxer shorts, repeatedly asked if she was going to get changed, causing her to panic and relive past abuse.

Source: Nurses win huge battle after woke NHS made them share changing room with trans woman | UK | News | Express.co.uk

DAILY DISPATCH: AGP Infiltrates Endometriosis Group | You’re Kiddin’, Right?

All entries on Feminist Legal Clinic’s News Digest Blog are extracts from news articles and other publications, with the source available at the link at the bottom. The content is not originally generated by Feminist Legal Clinic and does not necessarily reflect our views.

Not all AGPs have lactation fetishes. Some are aroused women’s reproductive system dysfunction, like endometriosis. You’re probably wondering what could possibly be sexy about this debilitating condition. If you’re a normal person the answer is ‘nothing’, but if you’re an AGP there are many things to be fascinated by. There’s the involvement of female sex organs, that these men are obsessed with. AGPs get turned on by women’s distress; endometriosis is painful so these dudes would love it for that alone. It can also cause women to bleed through their clothes, which would be embarrassing. That’s right up the AGP alley because quite a few of these dudes have humiliation fetishes; pretending to have no control over what comes out of your body is fun for these guys.

It ultimately comes down to dehumanizing women: reducing a real, life-altering medical condition to a sexual fantasy as if women’s lives are simply stories for men to entertain themselves with. These men see women, and the condition of being female, as essentially disordered, humiliating, dirty, painful and debilitating. Physical weakness, and the dependence on others that comes with it, is considered a crucial aspect of womanhood – these guys boast about not being able to open jars anymore once they start taking estrogen. Emotional instability is prized as another key feature of womanhood – they’re all over Reddit boasting about how much they cry since they’ve been on feminizing drugs. Men taking feminizing drugs induce pelvic floor dysfunction in themselves, leading to issues with incontinence, setting them up for ‘accidents’, furthering their humiliating ‘fun’.

In a sane world, these guys would keep their fantasies to themselves, or act them out with other pervs, harming only themselves. Well, we’re not living in a sane world. These clowns farm out their lunacy to the entire world, including to endometriosis support groups. What fun would it be to keep all this bat-shitery to oneself? Why not involve women actually suffering from the distress you like to imagine and jerk off to? Since none of it’s real anyway, since women aren’t real human beings and endometriosis is nothing more than a fun fantasy, why not join a group so you can sexually victimize distressed women, while making your ween happy? Endometriosis support group, here he comes – literally and figuratively.

Certainly women wouldn’t fawn so hard over some pervy dude that they’d allow him into their endometriosis support group. They would actually. Check this out:

Not only do they tolerate him, they ousted the woman who objects to having their painful medical condition used as a masturbatory aid by some degenerate. These women, by trying to be ‘progressive’ and ‘empathetic’ have turned their support group into a porn scenario. I can’t begin to fathom what these women are thinking, but it demonstrates that many women consider men’s desire to use them for nefarious ends to be more important that protecting themselves or supporting other women. This is one of the ways that women act against their own needs, allowing troonery to spread.

The fawning needs to end. Women MUST stop turning our resources over to men who use them for sexual entertainment.

Source: DAILY DISPATCH: AGP Infiltrates Endometriosis Group

Filmed without her knowledge in a fitting room, her testimony exposes a worrying scourge | The Body Optimist

All entries on Feminist Legal Clinic’s News Digest Blog are extracts from news articles and other publications, with the source available at the link at the bottom. The content is not originally generated by Feminist Legal Clinic and does not necessarily reflect our views.

The story of Lilou, filmed without her knowledge in a fitting room, recently shocked internet users. By sharing her experience, she revealed a chilling reality: miniature cameras, hidden in everyday objects, are now being used to film women without their consent, sometimes in places as private as fitting rooms or public restrooms.

In her TikTok video, the young woman (@lilouboutiin) recounts that she was shopping with her mother and sister on a perfectly ordinary afternoon. Nothing could have prepared her for what was about to happen. While changing in a fitting room, she noticed the sole of a man’s shoe protruding slightly under the partition. At first, she didn’t pay any attention, thinking it was simply someone waiting for a relative in the next fitting room.

But as she got closer, she noticed a disturbing detail: between the shoelaces was a tiny camera. It was then that she realized she was being filmed. Panicked, the man fled. Lilou’s mother tried to catch him, without success, before a stranger intervened and managed to stop the suspect until the security guards arrived.

Cybersecurity experts point out that tiny “spy cameras” can be easily purchased online and concealed in ordinary objects: pens, watches, buttons, or shoes. Calls to increase security in fitting rooms are growing, as are demands for retailers to install warning signs and increase surveillance of their premises.

Source: Filmed without her knowledge in a fitting room, her testimony exposes a worrying scourge

Mum taking legal action against SA government after teen exposed to ‘bestiality’ and ‘incest’ in public school presentation | Sky News Australia

All entries on Feminist Legal Clinic’s News Digest Blog are extracts from news articles and other publications, with the source available at the link at the bottom. The content is not originally generated by Feminist Legal Clinic and does not necessarily reflect our views.

A mother is taking legal action against the South Australian government over claims her 14-year-old daughter was exposed to a school presentation referencing bestiality and incest.

The impending lawsuit is being funded by faith-based legal organisation Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) International, which is working with Ms Gaylard’s local Adelaide lawyers.

The hour-long presentation was part of a Respectful Relationships program meant to “promote LGBTQIA+ inclusivity and acceptance” that was delivered to year 9 girls by an external provider in March last year at Renmark High School in regional South Australia.

At the time of the incident, Renmark High School principal Mat Evans apologised for the “inappropriate material”, for not seeking parental consent ahead of the presentation and for breaching the school’s duty of care by failing to have a staff member present in the room.

The Department for Education in South Australia also suspended Headspace Berri from delivering the Respectful Relationships program to public schools.

A spokesperson for Headspace National – a youth mental health foundation funded by the federal Department of Health and Aged Care – acknowledged aspects of the presentation were inappropriate and it had conducted its own review of what was delivered in the presentation and how it had been vetted.

Source: Mum taking legal action against SA government after teen exposed to ‘bestiality’ and ‘incest’ in public school presentation | Sky News Australia

AI, Anonymity Drive Rise in Online Violence Against Women | Mirage News

All entries on Feminist Legal Clinic’s News Digest Blog are extracts from news articles and other publications, with the source available at the link at the bottom. The content is not originally generated by Feminist Legal Clinic and does not necessarily reflect our views.

The alarm is being sounded this week by the UN agency for women’s rights, gender equality and women’s empowerment ( UN Women ) as the 16 Days of Activism campaign begins, calling for urgent action against soaring digital violence.

The space has become a frontline in the fight for gender equality, with less than 40 per cent of countries having laws addressing cyber harassment or cyberstalking, leaving perpetrators largely unchallenged and victims without justice.

The rise of AI has dramatically amplified digital abuse , making it faster, more targeted, and harder to detect. According to one global survey, 38 per cent of women have experienced online violence, and 85 per cent have witnessed it.

AI-powered deepfake technology is being weaponised on a large scale: up to 95 per cent of online deepfakes are non-consensual pornographic images, and 99 per cent of those targeted are women.

Digital abuse isn’t confined to screens. Online attacks quickly spill into real life, escalating in severity.

Many deepfake tools, developed by male teams, are not even designed to work on images of men, underscoring the gendered nature of this technology.

Source: AI, Anonymity Drive Rise in Online Violence Against Women | Mirage News