SPAIN: Prolific Serial Killer Transitions While Serving 127-Year Sentence, Is Now Being Held In A Women’s Unit – Reduxx

One of Spain’s most prolific serial killers is now being held in a women’s correctional unit after beginning to identify as transgender while behind bars. Joan Vila Dilmé, also known as the Olot nursing home killer, is reportedly now going by the name “Aida.”

Vila, 60, was sentenced to 127 years in prison in 2013 for the murders of 11 elderly residents at the care home he worked at.

During their report, the mainstream Spanish paper referred to Vila in the feminine, and attempted to minimize any allegations that this was done in order to gain any special treatment, arguing “her transition does not entail any benefits related to her sentence.”

As of now, he has yet to undergo any surgical alterations, but reportedly has plans to do so. His “gender-affirming” cosmetic surgeries will be paid for by Spain’s public healthcare system.

Source: SPAIN: Prolific Serial Killer Transitions While Serving 127-Year Sentence, Is Now Being Held In A Women’s Unit – Reduxx

Parents claim they destroyed healthy IVF embryos after being misled by N.J. genetic testing companies – nj.com

Hackettstown-based Genomic Prediction and Livingston-based Cooper Genomics face federal class action lawsuits alleging false advertising of PGT-A embryo testing.

Allison Freeman, an attorney representing the plaintiffs, said patients purchase the testing because it’s sold as having “high percentages of accuracy.”

The testing, which is rarely covered by insurance, is offered as an optional add-on during the IVF process. Although it’s marketed as increasing pregnancy and live birth rates, major medical organizations have stated that further research is necessary to establish its value.

The American Society for Reproductive Medicine published a practice guideline in 2018 concluding “there is insufficient evidence to recommend the routine use of preimplantation genetic testing-aneuploidy in all infertile women.”

Despite this, the proportion of IVF cycles using PGT-A increased from 14% in 2014 to 44% in 2019, according to national data from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Source: Parents claim they destroyed healthy IVF embryos after being misled by N.J. genetic testing companies – nj.com

The real reasons birth rates are declining worldwide | New Scientist

All entries on Feminist Legal Clinic’s News Digest Blog are extracts from news articles and other publications, with the source available at the link at the bottom. The content is not originally generated by Feminist Legal Clinic and does not necessarily reflect our views.

The fall is astonishing. At its height, the global fertility rate hit 5.3 births per woman in 1963, but it has been in near-constant decline ever since. Sixty years on, it is now only around 2.2. In many countries, it is far lower than the roughly 2.1 babies per woman that would sustain current population sizes, known as the replacement rate.

With the birth rate now sitting at about 1.4 to 1.6 in countries like the UK, Australia and the US – and as low as 1.2 in Japan and 0.75 in South Korea – our understanding of the global fertility decline has so far been driven by demographers, who take whole-population views and try to predict the future.

What this misses, argues Paula Sheppard, a cognitive and evolutionary anthropologist at the University of Oxford, are the nuances: which groups of society are having fewer children, and the different reasons why.

Penny Sarchet: There seems to be a lot of panic about birth rates at the moment.

Paula Sheppard: There’s a misconception: people think they’ve never been this low before, but they’re actually not [a record low]. After the second world war, rates were very low as well, and demographers, politicians and policy-makers were panicking. Demographers were trying to project what the population would look like – would birth rates recover? But the projections made in the late 1940s, when people weren’t having many babies after the war, were lower than what actually turned out to happen. Nobody got it right, because no one predicted the baby boom.

I’ve wondered if women simply don’t want to have the replacement level of children, and women with more education have more control over how many children they have. But your work has found that they are having fewer children than they would like?

People still want two or three kids. Not everyone does – there are always some people who don’t want kids at all. But in the UK, for every three babies that are wanted, only two are born.

However, higher-educated women are quite prepared not to have kids unless they’re sure that the father is going to invest as heavily as they are as a co-parent. I think it is because women take a higher career penalty.

It famously takes a village to raise a child and, due to urbanisation, more people than ever don’t have that village.

This is the crux of the matter. Social support was the most important thing in the study. A defining feature of our species is that female humans are able to have multiple dependent children at once. You don’t see this in chimpanzees, for example.

This cooperative breeding is literally what makes us human, and in every group I studied, they wanted support from their partner or their parents. The higher-educated women also wanted friends’ support – they wanted to know that there were mothers’ groups they could join and that their friends were also having kids.

You found that higher-educated women see it as unusual to have children before their 30s, which is quite old, anthropologically speaking. What’s driven this?

I think the reason people are waiting that long is because families are struggling to have all their proverbial ducks in a row before they’re ready to have a family – or have another child. If you made work and parenting more compatible, I think people would have kids younger.

Amid all the headlines and political commentary around birth rates, what’s the one thing you wish people could know about the issue?

It is about making parenting and working compatible, whatever that means for different people, and stopping pitting them against each other. They always used to be compatible. Women have always worked and they have always had kids. It’s just that now we live in this patriarchal setting: the office is the office, and children don’t go there. Instead, let’s change this whole culture.

Source: RemovePaywall | Free online paywall remover

Mom Threatens Melania She’ll Tell All if Custody of Son Not Returned | Women’s Coalition

All entries on Feminist Legal Clinic’s News Digest Blog are extracts from news articles and other publications, with the source available at the link at the bottom. The content is not originally generated by Feminist Legal Clinic and does not necessarily reflect our views.

Flanked by giant flags, with the Presidential seal looming above, Melania declared that she was never friends with, nor a victim of either Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell, the two most infamous child sex traffickers of our time. She insisted they were only acquaintances who had briefly crossed paths at parties.

Apparently, Melania has never heard of the Streisand Effect.

Her valiant effort to put a lid on any notion she may have been associated with the evil duo had the opposite effect: it’s blown up speculation about whatever the reason could be that the extremely private First Lady, who’s assiduously avoided commenting on anything Epstein, would suddenly speak out about the #1 scandal of the century.

Why would she do this. And why now?

Turns out, you don’t have to look far. Amanda Ungaro, a long-time friend of Melania’s, has just publicly slung some nasty threats in her direction, implying that the President and she are guilty of being involved with child sex abuse and/or trafficking. And she is ready to tell all.

These threats are most certainly being made in an effort to get her 15 year-old son returned to her custody, after her ex implemented an elaborate scheme with which to take their son away from her. The fact that she says, “I have nothing left to lose” indicates it is because she has lost what is most precious to her: her child. And she will do whatever it takes to get him back, including incriminating the President and First Lady.

Ironically, this particular crime—child sex abuse—is the one thing that can take down even the most powerful people, and, hence, whoever has the evidence has the ability to control the perpetrator, which is exactly why Epstein gathered this kind of dirt on everyone.

Trump has been accused of sexually assaulting at least four children, so it is not out of the realm of possibility. Katie Johnson (pseudonym) filed a lawsuit in 2016 claiming she and a girl named Maria had been sexually assaulted by Trump and Epstein when they were 11 and 12 years-old at Epstein’s NY mansion. She withdrew the suit due to threats on her life, but it can still be found online.

Recent evidence in the Epstein files have evidence that Trump sexually assaulted a 13 year-old girl (name redacted), who retaliated by biting Trump’s penis. Sascha Riley Barros alleges Trump raped him when he was 12 years-old and Sascha retaliated by impaling him.

All of these disclosures appear to have corroboration, but none have been investigated. Trump denies them all.

Source: Mom Threatens Melania She’ll Tell All if Custody of Son Not Returned

Had an honest conversation with Senator Weiner about women’s safety. – YouTube| Tish Hyman

Penis Costume-Wearing Grandma Arrested at Trump Protest, Body Cam Video | AOL

Hilarious moment at a Trump protest in Alabama … a grandmother wearing an inflatable penis costume on the side of the road got arrested … and it’s all on video.

Newly released police body cam footage shows the moment 61-year-old Renea Gamble is confronted and busted by law enforcement during a No Kings protest in Fairhope.

TMZ

Cops say Renea was charged with disorderly conduct and resisting arrest … but she’s fighting the charges, and say it’s ridiculous she could resist arrest from inside an inflatable penis.

Source: Penis Costume-Wearing Grandma Arrested at Trump Protest, Body Cam Video

Inside the Gay Tech Mafia | WIRED

All entries on Feminist Legal Clinic’s News Digest Blog are extracts from news articles and other publications, with the source available at the link at the bottom. The content is not originally generated by Feminist Legal Clinic and does not necessarily reflect our views.

No one can say exactly when, or if, gay men started running Silicon Valley.

[W]hen I call up a well-connected hedge fund manager to ask his thoughts about what is sometimes referred to in industry circles as the “gay tech mafia,” he audibly yawns. “Of course,” he says. “This has always been the case.”

And it is absolutely the case now, he adds, when gay men are running influential companies in Silicon Valley and maintain entire social calendars with scarcely a straight man, much less a woman, in sight. “Of course the gay tech mafia exists,” he continues. “This is not some Illuminati conspiracy theory. And you do not have to be gay to join. They like straight guys who sleep with them even more.”

Sure, there were gay men in high places: Peter Thiel, Tim Cook, Sam Altman, Keith Rabois, the list went on. But the idea that they were operating some kind of shadowy cabal seemed born entirely of homophobia.

At an AI conference in Los Angeles, an engineer casually referred to a top AI firm’s offices, more than once, as “twink town.”

One San Francisco investor tells me that he believes the Thiel Fellowship is a training ground for gay industry leaders.

[O]ne afternoon in late November, spend nearly an hour texting one . . . account owner over Signal who agrees to speak to me only if I keep his handle secret.

This person describes the Valley as a place known for “ecstasy, psychedelic fueled gay sex stuff.” Has he experienced any of it himself? No. But he knows people who have—people who are “pretty afraid” and “young af.” He won’t name names, won’t connect me to anyone, but he swears that any negative rumor I’ve heard about gay men in Silicon Valley is true. He suggests a conspiracy so sprawling it rivals QAnon and implicates the entire US government.

Finally, frustrated by his evasiveness, I ask what he thinks will happen if he tells me what he knows. “I truly believe,” he says, “killed.”

The problem with conspiracy theories, even offensive ones, is that they are rarely wholly invented.

Most of the people who speak to me for this story do so on the condition that their names be kept confidential.

In 2022, a popular anonymous tech insider X account, Roon, tweeted that it was “crazy how venture capitalists have reinvented the Roman system of pederasty.”

I’m told to connect with Joel, a gay man who works in tech and who spent a lot of time among the older in-group of powerful gay men in Silicon Valley, more than a decade ago.

When I ask Joel to explain how the gay tech mafia works, he tells me that it’s similar to people who “went to the same college or came from a similar background or a similar town.”

Joel tells me about the parties at the time—the exact specifics of which remain off the record. But they were, in summary, what you might expect.

I tell Joel that I’ve heard from some young men in the tech industry who feel pressured to sleep around to get ahead. Was that true in his experience? “Mmmmm,” he says, and pauses. Then he bursts out laughing. “I mean, in all of this, there are weird gray areas. It can be very sexual. It is not all professional. A lot of people have dated or slept with each other.” He had experienced a kind of coercion firsthand. “I definitely felt pressured to do—not overtly illegal things. But they walked the line.”

The exchange of sex and status may not be the reason these men rose so quickly, but it can be a factor—if only because sex, as he puts it, “makes people become closer rapidly.”

Source: Inside the Gay Tech Mafia | WIRED

EXCLUSIVE: Transgender Baby Killer Released Into Indiana Community 30 Years Before The End of His 55-Year Sentence | Genevieve Gluck

All entries on Feminist Legal Clinic’s News Digest Blog are extracts from news articles and other publications, with the source available at the link at the bottom. The content is not originally generated by Feminist Legal Clinic and does not necessarily reflect our views.

A trans-identified male convicted of the grisly murder of an infant has been released on parole a full 30 years early. Jonathan Richardson, who now uses the name Autumn Cordellioné, was convicted in 2002 after his 11-month-old stepdaughter died in his care while her mother was at work. Having served less than half of his 55-year sentence, Richardson was quietly released in late December of 2025.

Without an official statement from the DOC, it is unclear why Richardson was released early. However, the decision may have been linked to an injunction granted in state court that required the IDOC to provide Richardson with taxpayer-funded cosmetic surgeries. Releasing Richardson early may have been the IDOC’s strategy to avoid paying for the court-ordered cosmetic enhancements.

As previously reported by Reduxx, in 2023, the ACLU of Indiana filed a legal complaint on behalf of Richardson claiming that the IDOC was subjecting him to “cruel and unusual punishment” by denying him the various plastic surgeries he had demanded.

[D]uring court proceedings Richardson stated that he had amended his demands to two surgeries, an orchiectomy and a penile inversion.

In addition to identifying as transgender, Richardson identifies as “Muslim,” and had launched a separate lawsuit against his prison’s chaplain for being denied a hijab.

Richardson had been serving a 55-year sentence for the murder of his 11-month-old stepdaughter after he had been left to care for the child while her mother was at work.

Richardson went to a neighbor’s home and asked them to call 911, claiming the child was unresponsive. The baby would later die at the hospital, with the cause of death determined to be asphyxiation by manual strangulation.

Richardson was booked awaiting a court hearing, and would later tell a prison official “all I know is I killed the little fucking bitch.” The following year, he was found guilty and sentenced to 55 years in prison.

Since being released, Richardson has created several social media profiles and has launched an OnlyFans, where he says he has been selling pornography of himself.

In other social media posts, the transgender baby killer describes being in a relationship with another man who claims to identify as transgender and was also convicted of killing an infant. In 2015, Cory Wallace set his house on fire in an attempt to cover up the fact that he had battered his 4-month old son to death. The following year, Wallace was convicted of charges including neglect of a dependent resulting in death and arson and sentenced to 72 years in prison.

Wallace, who is to spend the rest of his life in prison, has persisted in filing lawsuits against the IDOC. In July 2023 Wallace demanded a hefty payout of $500,000 as compensation for not having been granted state-funded cosmetic surgeries.

The mother of the baby girl Richardson strangled to death opposed his legal bid to obtain surgery. Linda Thomas submitted a brief statement expressing her concern that his identity may be concealed from her when he is released from prison.

Source: EXCLUSIVE: Transgender Baby Killer Released Into Indiana Community 30 Years Before The End of His 55-Year Sentence

Baby Should Be Immediately Removed from Convicted Child Predator – Daily Citizen

Brandon Keith Mitchell is a Tier 1 registered sex offender, and yet he and his homosexual partner recently obtained custody of a newborn baby through surrogacy.

How is this even possible?

There’s a loophole in Pennsylvania law that doesn’t bar sex offenders from privately contracting with other parties in reproductive agreements.

Mitchell and his partner have been parading the baby on social media, and even solicited funds to pay for the surrogate. A journalist decided to dig into the background of the two men and discovered Mitchell had previously been arrested for soliciting a 16-year-old boy.

As a chemistry teacher at Downingtown West High School in Downingtown, Pennsylvania, the 30-year-old Mitchell pleaded guilty to felony child pornography charges and corruption of a minor. He sent over 12,000 text messages to the student. He was sentenced to two years in prison.

Those who support same-sex parenting often to point to studies indicating there’s no difference between a child being raised by two men or two women compared to being raised by a mother and a father. Yet, those studies have been shown to be fundamentally flawed. They’re often based on self-reporting, feature individuals recruited from same-sex advocacy groups – and are often only looking at small groups for a short period of time.

The Pennsylvania legislature needs to immediately close the loophole that allows convicted child sexual predators to contract to basically buy a child. That’s legislation every sane person should unequivocally support.

Source: Baby Should Be Immediately Removed from Convicted Child Predator – Daily Citizen

$2.46 Billion ‘Momnibus’ Bill Targets Pregnant Women for Vaccination | John Fleetwood

All entries on Feminist Legal Clinic’s News Digest Blog are extracts from news articles and other publications, with the source available at the link at the bottom. The content is not originally generated by Feminist Legal Clinic and does not necessarily reflect our views.

A federal bill introduced in Congress would create a system where pregnant women are not only targeted for increased vaccination but also tracked through a federally coordinated surveillance network that activates during pandemics.

H.R. 7973—the “Momnibus Act”—authorizes a staggering $2.46 billion overall, with $715 million of that specifically allocated to build this structure: combining mass vaccination initiatives with a real-time data tracking system designed to monitor health status, outcomes, and demographic characteristics during declared public health emergencies.

The bill constructs a pipeline to identify the population, increase medical intervention, and track the results—continuously, at scale, and under federal coordination.

From a health freedom standpoint, this represents a shift away from individual consent-driven care and toward a system where specific populations are identified, targeted, and monitored during crises.

The legislation was introduced on March 18, 2026 by U.S. Representative Lauren Underwood (D-IL-14) and immediately routed to multiple House committees, including Energy and Commerce.

It remains at the earliest stage of the legislative process, with no hearings or votes.

Campaign finance data shows support from healthcare systems, insurance networks, and pharmaceutical-aligned interests—industries that would directly benefit from:

  • expanded vaccination programs
  • increased federal funding streams
  • long-term surveillance infrastructure

The same entities positioned to carry out the bill’s mandates are among those funding its sponsor.

Funding is explicitly tied to expanding these efforts, with hundreds of millions authorized specifically for awareness and equity campaigns that prioritize populations with “low rates of vaccination” and “racial and ethnic minority groups.”

The federal government is authorized to identify which groups are not complying with recommended vaccination schedules and focus massive resources on increasing uptake in those populations.

That is a shift from informed consent at the individual level to behavioral targeting at the population level.

All collected data must be categorized by “race, ethnicity, gender, primary language, geography, socioeconomic status.”

Rather than just tracking disease, the bill would allow tracking of mothers who have the disease, where they are, and what demographic group they belong to.

That enables targeted interventions and creates a framework for population-level categorization tied to medical status.

Source: $2.46 Billion ‘Momnibus’ Bill Targets Pregnant Women for Vaccination—Builds $715 Million Real-Time Surveillance System Activated During Pandemics