How A Handful Of Billionaires Created The Transgender “Movement”

Bilek spent her life on the Left, but now she says that she is in the “political wilderness,” reporting on the biggest cultural story of our day while progressives ignore it or cover it up.

Bilek is doing something that journalists used to do instinctively: following the money. What she has uncovered is a bombshell that reveals the extent to which the transgender phenomenon has been created by super-wealthy LGBT donors who have a dark and sinister agenda. Her journalism supplies the missing pieces needed to complete the picture of how and why the transgender movement so swiftly achieved cultural dominance. Bilek kindly agreed to an interview in which she shared what she has uncovered thus far.

To what extent are the cultural shifts we’ve seen in the past few years astroturfed by big donors?

The cultural shifts we see today regarding gender identity are largely influenced by huge capital inflows from governments, philanthropists, corporations, and investment management and accounting firms like Blackrock and Ernst & Young.

Both the money and the ideology come out of the medical-tech sector, which is itself being integrated into culture through a philanthropic structure that has been attached to the LGBT civil rights political apparatus.

[Discussion of Pritzker family, Jon Stryker and Arcus Foundation, Gill Foundation, tech giants and mainstream media.]

How has big money impacted the trajectory and influence of the transgender movement?

I prefer to characterize this phenomenon as an industry rather than a movement. The focus lies on the creation of synthetic simulacrums of human reproductive characteristics, marketed for profit and human engineering. Contrary to a genuine human rights movement for the marginalized, synthetic sex characteristics are a corporate illusion.

What are the primary goals and motives of those pouring their money into LGBT organizations?

The strategic linking of an agenda aimed at deconstructing reproductive sex with a civil rights movement centered on same-sex attraction was pure genius—a metaphorical fox in the henhouse, but dressed as a hen.

With the development of injections capable of altering our DNA, there is apparent potential for profitability in treating the human body, fetuses, and women’s reproductive organs as canvases for technological interventions. The tech reproduction industry seems like a harbinger of a future in which reproduction without copulation or gestation may be the norm. The gender identity narrative serves these marketing ventures as it reduces our wholly sexed humanity to commodities.

Who are some of the most significant contributors to the transgender movement?

Gilead Sciences emerges as a leading supporter of LGBT issues, with other notable contributors including George Soros’ Open Society, Gill, Arcus, Ford, Astraea, Tides, Evelyn and Walter Haas, David Bohnett, Wells Fargo, and Pride Foundations. These entities are prominent funders of the agenda to deconstruct human reproductive sex.

Martine Rothblatt stands as another influential figure in this societal transformation. . . . Describing himself as ‘transhuman,’ Rothblatt advocates for human augmentation that challenges traditional concepts of sex. This includes advocating for the melding of humans with AI, virtual reality, tech reproduction, and other transformative technologies.

With LGBT organizations receiving enormous infusions of cash from financial backers, how can small, grassroots groups push back?

By reframing the narrative away from human rights for the marginalized towards rights for those attempting to disown their humanity, we can offer a fresh perspective. Gender rights, in this context, serve as the political groundwork for the burgeoning rights discourse surrounding artificial intelligence (AI) or cyborgs in their early stages.

Source: How A Handful Of Billionaires Created The Transgender “Movement”

Amie’s Story | Cruel & Unusual Punishment | Independent Women’s Forum

When California’s “Transgender Respect, Agency, and Dignity Act”—Senate Bill 132—was signed into law by Governor Gavin Newsom in 2021, it set the stage for male prisoners to be housed with female prisoners. The male prisoners do not have to be in the process of “gender-affirming” treatment.

Amie Ichikawa, 42, now free after serving nearly five years at the Central California Women’s Facility in Chowchilla, said that some male prisoners claim non-male identities because female prisons are, as a general rule, less violent than men’s prisons. “There was a male prisoner who had single-cell status in his all-male prison because he assaulted his bunkmates,” Ichikawa said. “He had been isolated in the male prison but they put him directly into the general population here in a room with seven ladies right off the bus.

When former California inmate Amie Ichikawa returned to the free world, she began sounding the alarms about women being harmed as a result of males gaining access to female prison. Her desperate pleas for help, however, were met with the cold-shoulder by organizations that traditionally serve as advocates for female inmates.

These advocates dismissed her concerns and instead told her to “be careful” and “learn the language.” But Ichikawa doesn’t view what’s happening to female inmates under new prison “transgender” policies as political; to her, it’s a human rights issue, and she’s refusing to be silent.

Source: Amie’s Story | Cruel & Unusual Punishment | Independent Women’s Forum

Former Olympian Caitlyn Jenner opens up about trans women in professional sport | news.com.au — Australia’s leading news site

Caitlyn Jenner, widely considered the world’s most well known transgender woman, has given her take on the debate over trans people and professional sport.

The 74-year-old won a gold medal in the decathlon at the 1976 Olympic Games competing as Bruce Jenner before transitioning to Caitlyn in 2015.

Now in a wide-ranging interview alongside former Olympic swimmer Sharron Davies with The Telegraph in the UK, Jenner has given strong views about trans women and sport.

Earlier this month, trans golfer Hailey Davidson was banned from the professional NXXT Women’s Pro Tour after the competition changed its eligibility rules

The Tour released a statement announcing any competitor that was not “a biological female at birth” was ineligible to participate.

Jenner strongly agrees with that sentiment, declaring hormone therapy does not make for a level playing field between females and transgender women.

“(I’m) someone who went through a complete change and I can still hit a golf ball 280 yards (256 metres),” she said.

“I know the effects of (female) hormones on the body, it does have a little bit of an effect but it’s not a major effect, and certainly not enough to make it even.

“I have been pushing here to go back to chromosome tests. If they continue down this road it will be pretty much the end of women’s sport as we know it.”

Davies, who competed against the East German doping regime when winning silver in the pool at the 1980 Moscow Olympics, is also concerned for the future of women’s sport.

”We have such a small piece of the cake,” Davies said, referencing the differences in sponsorship between men and women in sport.

”And now we’re supposed to move over for what in most cases is mediocre male athletes who are identifying as females who just think that they have the right to take our opportunities away.”

Source: Former Olympian Caitlyn Jenner opens up about trans women in professional sport | news.com.au — Australia’s leading news site

UN Rights Experts Make False Promises About Prostitution – PassBlue

The United Nations working group on discrimination against women and girls published a paper last year that not only fails to address the widespread human rights violations caused by prostitution and pornography, but also advocates for policies that will endanger women and girls.

The guidance paper, “Eliminating discrimination against sex workers and securing their human rights,” now circulating in the UN system, ostensibly offers ways to address the violence women endure in prostitution, but the use of the terminology of “sex work” raises red flags. The theme of the 68th annual Commission on the Status of Women (CSW), the UN’s largest gathering on gender equality, is investing more in women to lift them out of poverty, among other goals. One proposal, however, that is circulating among member states to endorse the paper contravenes the goals.

Instead of dealing with the scourge of prostitution within a human rights framework, the paper urges countries to decriminalize the sex trade, including all commercial sex establishments, sex buying, sex tourism, and pimping — actions that would corrode women’s rights and spur more sex trafficking.

The #MeToo movement has revealed the egregious, lifelong damage sexual harassment and sexual violence inflicts on women. However, if money is exchanged (as in the system of prostitution), our culture paints this abuse as a consenting act with no harm done.

Source: UN Rights Experts Make False Promises About Prostitution – PassBlue

EXCLUSIVE: Female Athletes Sue NCAA Over Transgender Competitors in Sports | The Free Press

Over a dozen female athletes are suing the National Collegiate Athletics Association for letting transgender athletes compete against them and use female locker rooms in college sports.

At the center of the class-action lawsuit is Lia Thomas, the trans athlete who dominated the 2022 NCAA Swimming Championships while a student at the University of Pennsylvania. The suit states that both the NCAA and Georgia Tech, which hosted the event, knowingly violated Title IX, the federal statute that guarantees equal opportunity for men and women in college education and sports.

The lawsuit, the first federal action of its kind, seeks to change the rules, rendering any biological males ineligible to compete against female athletes. It demands the NCAA revoke all awards given to trans athletes in women’s competitions and “reassign” them to their female contenders. It also asks for “damages for pain and suffering, mental and emotional distress, suffering and anxiety, expense costs and other damages due to defendants’ wrongful conduct.”

Source: EXCLUSIVE: Female Athletes Sue NCAA Over Transgender Competitors in Sports | The Free Press

Poor Things and Misogynistic Dreams: How Abusers Sexually Mistreat Disabled Women – Women’s eNews

A 2020 study found that 28% of cases of girls who were sexually trafficked had an intellectual disability compared to the 1-3% of national prevalence. The more severe physical impairment and low cognitive abilities, the higher the risks.

Women with intellectual delays also face myriad personal and socio-environmental barriers in their sexual lives, such as difficulties with lack of sexual experience and negative sexual experiences with nondisabled individuals.

This sobering reality is the backdrop to one of the most critically lauded films of the year, Poor Things by Yorgos Lanthimos. Based on the novel by Alasdair GrayPoor Things, earned 11 Oscar nominations and four wins, including  Best Actress for Emma Stone..

The movie invites us to see Bella’s evolution as a tale of women’s emancipation and sexual liberation. But really, she is an experiment subjected to a sadistic chains of events, camouflaged by extravagant and colorful costumes.

Most film critics praised Poor Things for its “surreal humor,” “contagious fun,” or as “creatively uninhibited.” The film won a Golden Globe for Best Comedy or Musical, and Stone for Best Actress for her performance. But Lanthimos’ cinematographic fantasy of men purchasing a woman with impaired faculties for sex is neither original nor humorous.

Bella is not the female version of Frankenstein. Unlike Bella, he is not the constant object of male sexual desire and control.

Poor Things is yet another production of misogynists’ dream: to create, own, control, sexualize, infantilize, and commodify women at their pleasure.  One of Hollywood’s favorite themes.

Source: Poor Things and Misogynistic Dreams: How Abusers Sexually Mistreat Disabled Women – Women’s eNews

Children to stop getting puberty blockers at gender identity clinics, says NHS England | Gender | The Guardian

Children who have gender dysphoria will no longer be given puberty blockers, NHS England has said, ahead of a radical change in how it cares for them.

There is not enough evidence about either how safe they are to take or whether they are clinically effective to justify prescribing them to children and young people who are transitioning, it added.

The government welcomed NHS England’s “landmark decision”, which it said was “in the best interests of children”.

A spokesperson said: “NHS England has carefully considered the evidence review conducted by NICE and further published evidence available to date.

“We have concluded that there is not enough evidence to support the safety or clinical effectiveness of puberty suppressing hormones to make the treatment routinely available at this time.”

Puberty blockers arrest the physical changes in a child’s body that puberty brings, such as the development of breasts or facial hair. The NHS’s decision means that the new regional services caring for under-18s with gender dysphoria, which open next month, will not use them as part of the treatment.

From now on, children and young people will only be able to get them if they are taking part in a clinical trial. At least one such trial is due to start later this year, but no details, such as who will be eligible to join it, have been published.

Source: Children to stop getting puberty blockers at gender identity clinics, says NHS England | Gender | The Guardian

Gender Dysphoria and Anorexia in Adolescent Females | SEGM

A new publication* in Sexuologie (the journal of the German Society for Sexual Medicine, Sexual Therapy and Sexual Science/DGSMTW) takes on the issue of the sharp rise in transgender identification in adolescent females, which remains poorly understood. The authors, Korte and Gille, present an intriguing hypothesis for this novel phenomenon, comparing and contrasting gender dysphoria to anorexia nervosa, and finding a number of important similarities.

The authors conclude that clinicians working with gender-dysphoric adolescents must familiarize themselves with the complex dynamics of female adolescent development, and that trans-affirmative medical interventions should not be considered until adolescent development is complete. With the Journal’s permission, SEGM is posting the full English-language translation below, preceded by a brief synopsis and the SEGM take-away.

Synopsis “The development of a stable female identity in adolescence is highly complex, demanding, susceptible to disruption and accompanied by crises,” observe Korte and Gille. Female puberty presents serious challenges that every girl must find a way to navigate. Temporary crises during this stage are common as girls attempt to navigate their changing bodies and the ways families, peers, and society at large respond to these changes. The authors observe that successfully traversing this crucial phase of psychosocial and identity development requires “a high degree of willingness to change, flexibility and advanced emotional and self-regulation skills.”   When an adolescent girl fails to negotiate these challenges successfully, serious disorders, including anorexia and gender dysphoria, may arise, with psychological conflicts projecting onto the body. Either disorder may serve as an “exit strategy” employed when a girl cannot find a way to accept her developing female body.

Source: Gender Dysphoria and Anorexia in Adolescent Females | SEGM

Moob Juice is Child Abuse – protesting men who ‘breastfeed’ for kicks -Lily Maynard

The dairy industry informs the UK consumer that there is exciting news! The latest scientific advances mean they can artificially induce lactation in bulls using a cocktail of hormones and chemicals! It’s great! This ‘bovine milk’ is put on the market and sold to the public as the real thing, kosher, bona fide, JUST AS GOOD. Would the public buy it?

Of course not. Putting aside the fact that dairy cows, unlike human women, are already pumped full of hormones to keep them lactating, nobody would want to drink bull ‘milk’ because it’s so blindingly obvious that it is both wrong and unnecessary. As for being ‘just as good’, I just don’t buy it. And neither would you.

Incidentally, ‘milking the bull’ is an old-fashioned saying which uses the metaphor to indicate “an activity or enterprise that has no chance of succeeding; to do something pointless and futile.”

In short, there are no properly medically controlled or documented studies concerning ‘moob juice’, although there is enough anecdotal evidence, and a few rather patchy records and reports that suggest that it can contain sustenance in some form or another.

What about the colostrum, so important to the first few days of a breastfed baby’s life? What about the changing consistency of breastmilk that is so essential to a breastfed newborn’s development?

Even if moob juice can provide nutritional content, how can it be measured with just one – or two, or three- assessments? Can moob juice offer parental immunities and benefits? And if this cocktail is so effective, easy and harmless a treatment, why is it not being offered to more women who have problems breastfeeding?

Source: Moob Juice is Child Abuse – protesting men who ‘breastfeed’ for kicks -Lily Maynard